2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.rlu.0000227013.36421.ce
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pragmatic Protocol for I-131 rhTSH-Stimulated Ablation Therapy in Patients With Renal Failure

Abstract: Dosimetry performed on euthyroid dialysis patients permits I-131 dose selection and avoids the additional morbidity of hypothyroidism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three approaches to 131 I therapy: empiric fixed amounts, therapy determined by the upper bound limit of blood and body dosimetry, and quantitative tumor dosimetry (335). Dosimetric methods are often reserved for patients with distant metastases or unusual situations such as renal insufficiency (336,337) or when therapy with rhTSH stimulation is deemed necessary. Comparison of outcome among these methods from published series is difficult (334).…”
Section: Algorithm For Management Of Dtc Six To Twelve Months After Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three approaches to 131 I therapy: empiric fixed amounts, therapy determined by the upper bound limit of blood and body dosimetry, and quantitative tumor dosimetry (335). Dosimetric methods are often reserved for patients with distant metastases or unusual situations such as renal insufficiency (336,337) or when therapy with rhTSH stimulation is deemed necessary. Comparison of outcome among these methods from published series is difficult (334).…”
Section: Algorithm For Management Of Dtc Six To Twelve Months After Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a full-text screening we excluded another 31 studies for various reasons: they gave no relevant information on dosing or aspects related to dosing ( n = 18), they addressed only the radiation safety of staff ( n = 5), described renal imaging ( n = 5), or were review ( n = 3). A total of 34 studies remained for inclusion in this systematic review (Akers et al 2016 ; Aktaş et al 2008 ; Alevizaki et al 2006 ; Bhat et al 2017 ; Courbon et al 1997 , 2006 ; Culpepper et al 1992 ; Daumerie et al 1996 ; Demko et al 1998 ; Driedger et al 2006 ; El-Zeftawy et al 2017 ; Fofi et al 2013 ; Holst et al 2005 ; Howard and Glasser 1981 ; Jiménez et al 2001 ; Kaptein et al 2000 ; Kode et al 2017 ; Laffon et al 2008 ; Magné et al 2002 ; McKay and Malaroda 2019 ; McKillop et al 1985 ; Mello et al 1994 ; Minamimoto et al 2007 ; Miyasaka et al 1997 ; Morrish et al 1990 ; Pahlka and Sonnad 2006 ; Sinsakul and Ali 2004 ; Tobes et al 1989 ; Toriihara et al 2015 ; Toubert et al 2001 ; Vermandel et al 2020 ; Wang et al 2003 ; Willegaignon et al 2010 ; Yeyin et al 2016 ). The selection process is illustrated in a PRISMA flow diagram (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“……Dosimetric methods are often reserved for patients with distant metastases or unusual situations such as renal insufficiency [4, 5] or when therapy with rhTSH stimulation is deemed necessary.…No prospective randomized trial to address the optimal therapeutic approach has been published.…In the future, the use of 123 I or 131 I with modern SPECT/CT or 124 I PET-based dosimetry may facilitate whole-body and lesional dosimetry [6, 7]. In the treatment of locoregional or metastatic disease, no recommendation can be made about the superiority of one method of RAI administration over another (empiric high dose vs. blood and/or body dosimetry vs. lesional dosimetry.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%