2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-1898-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of group transdiagnostic cognitive-behaviour therapy for anxiety disorders in primary care: study protocol

Abstract: BackgroundAnxiety disorders are the most common mental disorders in community settings, and they are associated with significant psychological distress, functional and social impairment. While cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is the most consistently efficacious psychological treatment for anxiety disorders, barriers preclude widespread implementation of CBT in primary care. Transdiagnostic group CBT (tCBT) focuses on cognitive and behavioural processes and intervention strategies common to different anxiety … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was a multisite, single-blind, patient-level, two-arm pragmatic superiority randomized trial in community-based care settings within three regions in Québec, Canada. The protocol was published (Roberge et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was a multisite, single-blind, patient-level, two-arm pragmatic superiority randomized trial in community-based care settings within three regions in Québec, Canada. The protocol was published (Roberge et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PHQ-9; Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001 ), functioning measures (e.g. Sheehan Disability Scale; Sheehan, Harnett-Sheehan, & Raj, 1996 ), and therapy process measures (described in the protocol; Roberge et al, 2018 ). Participants received a $20 compensation for in-person assessments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design and the results of the pragmatic randomized controlled trial are detailed elsewhere (Roberge et al, 2018, 2020). In summary, participants were recruited from the general population and were volunteers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants provided written informed consent for their de-identified data to be used for the primary purposes of the original study, as well as other related analyses for future research. The study design and details are described in detail elsewhere (Roberge et al, 2018(Roberge et al, , 2020. All methods and procedures were reviewed and approved by local institutional ethical review boards.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%