2022
DOI: 10.3390/v14040681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pre- and Within-Pandemic Survey of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Saliva Swabs from Stray Cats in Switzerland

Abstract: Cats have been shown to be highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, and transmission within the species has been demonstrated experimentally. In cats undergoing natural SARS-CoV-2 infections, human-to-animal transmission was mostly suspected. It can be postulated that, in stray cats with no or only minimal contact with humans, SARS-CoV-2 may pose a minor risk. The current study investigated the prevalence of active SARS-CoV-2 infections in Swiss stray cats using quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time polymerase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the fact that cats in the foster network were all kittens and presented with ocular and respiratory diseases could also impact our results and the probability of being exposed to SARS-CoV-2 or other viral pathogens. However, a previous report of SARS-CoV-2 showed no difference in prevalence between cats with and without clinical evidence of respiratory disease, 7 suggesting that a difference would not have been expected between the groups assessed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the fact that cats in the foster network were all kittens and presented with ocular and respiratory diseases could also impact our results and the probability of being exposed to SARS-CoV-2 or other viral pathogens. However, a previous report of SARS-CoV-2 showed no difference in prevalence between cats with and without clinical evidence of respiratory disease, 7 suggesting that a difference would not have been expected between the groups assessed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…The extent to which SARS‐CoV‐2 replicates in vulnerable cat populations, especially in those with high turnover rates and high rates of movement among households or institutions, has yet to be determined. Although cats seem to play a limited role in the spread of SARS‐CoV‐2 and the risk of cats spreading this virus to humans is considered to be low, 7 infection could potentially lead to low adoption rates and an increased reliance on euthanasia. This study was designed to survey the prevalence of FECV and SARS‐CoV‐2 within cats and kittens in shelters and foster homes in the Central Valley of California.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, epidemiological studies of the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in stray animals reported a lower prevalence than the one observed in owned animals. Different studies analyzed the seroprevalence of stray cats ranging between 0% and 3.5% [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 60 ]; conversely, only a few studies have analyzed serological positivity for SARS-CoV-2 in free-roaming/shelter dogs [ 38 , 60 ]. Recently, Cardillo et al [ 60 ] described a higher seroprevalence in stray dogs (1.28%) rather than in cats (0.42%) in the Campania region (southern Italy), whereas this trend is reversed in owned animals of the same region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stray cats and dogs and colony cats have a great ecological impact due to their interaction with other urban and periurban animals [ 31 , 32 ]. Their epidemiological role in the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe and other countries has been analyzed in different studies and a broad range of prevalence was found [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. SARS-CoV-2 in domestic cats and dogs mostly showed the absence of prominent clinical signs [ 28 , 39 ] but stray animals do not receive the same veterinary and preventive care as domestic pets, possibly resulting in serious health issues if infected with concomitant diseases [ 36 , 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction of oropharyngeal, nasal and rectal swabs was performed as described previously [ 21 ]. All nucleic acid samples underwent RT-qPCR targeting the viral envelope (E) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) genes, as described previously [ 24 ]. Negative RT-qPCR controls (RNAse–DNase-free water, AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany), a negative extraction control (PBS) and a positive RT-qPCR control (in vitro-transcribed RNA control containing three concatenated sequences of RdRp, E, and nucleocapsid (N) SARS-CoV-2 genes: RNA_Wuhan_RdRp-E-N) were assayed with every run.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%