2010
DOI: 10.2208/kaigan.66.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Precise Calculation Method of the Gradient Operator in Numerical Computation with the MPS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…regular particle distribution is assumed), varied correction techniques have been proposed in order to enhance the accuracy of the MPS method. For instance, Khayyer-Gotoh gradient operator anti-symmetrization [42], Khayyer-Gotoh divergence operator correction [43], Khayyer-Gotoh Laplace operator correction [44], Khayyer-Gotoh gradient operator correction [45], and Suzuki gradient operator correction [39,91] are proposed. Only Suzuki method based on weighted least squares technique can achieve 1st order consistency for gradient operator; however, others do not hold differential completeness/reproducing conditions in general case.…”
Section: Theorem 23 ( Pth Order Differential Completeness/ Reproducimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…regular particle distribution is assumed), varied correction techniques have been proposed in order to enhance the accuracy of the MPS method. For instance, Khayyer-Gotoh gradient operator anti-symmetrization [42], Khayyer-Gotoh divergence operator correction [43], Khayyer-Gotoh Laplace operator correction [44], Khayyer-Gotoh gradient operator correction [45], and Suzuki gradient operator correction [39,91] are proposed. Only Suzuki method based on weighted least squares technique can achieve 1st order consistency for gradient operator; however, others do not hold differential completeness/reproducing conditions in general case.…”
Section: Theorem 23 ( Pth Order Differential Completeness/ Reproducimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is that when the two space vectors are introduced to the Taylor expansion of the gradient equation, the nonzero assumption of each vector is guaranteed but the product of the two vectors is not. This problem also exists in predecessor's gradient operators that are derived from the Taylor series expansion . To resolve this problem, an integrated pressure gradient model is constituted as follows: ptrue|i={,1n0false∑ijwboldrjboldri(),rjri|boldrjboldri|boldrjboldriT|boldrjboldri|1[],1n0ijw()||rjripjptruêitrue|rjritrue|boldrjboldrbolditrue|rjritrue|2.6emdet(),Ci0.05Dsn0ijw()||rjripjptruêitrue|rjritrue|boldrjboldrbolditrue|rjritrue|20.5emdet(),Ci<0.05…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is that when the two space vectors are introduced to the Taylor expansion of the gradient equation, the nonzero assumption of each vector is guaranteed but the product of the two vectors is not. This problem also exists in predecessor's gradient operators that are derived from the Taylor series expansion [20,25,33]. To resolve this problem, an integrated pressure gradient model is constituted as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ⊗ is the tensor product. This model was applied by Iribe and Nakaza [13] to the analysis of incompressible fluid. By this Equation, the calculation accuracy around a boundary is maintained and the calculation accuracy is improved more than the previous method.…”
Section: The High Accuracy Gradient Model and The High Accuracy Laplamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high accuracy divergence model is applied as shown in Eq. (13). In these models, the primary convergent is ensured by Tamai et al [14]…”
Section: The High Accuracy Gradient Model and The High Accuracy Laplamentioning
confidence: 99%