1999
DOI: 10.4138/2031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A predatory Rusophycus burrow from the Cambrian of southern New Brunswick, eastern Canada

Abstract: A specimen of the trilobite-produced trace fossil Rusophycus is intimately associated with the annelid-produced meandering burrow Helminthopsis hieroglyphica on the upper surface of an amalgamated quartz arenite of the King Square Formation (late Middle - early Late Cambrian), Saint John Group, southern New Brunswick. Observations suggest that the rusophycid reflects, and is a rather unusual example of, predatory behaviour. Similar, but rare, examples have only occasionally been reported in the geologic record… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study area, arenites also contain linguloid brachiopods and/or are mantled by rare shallow-tier trace fossils such as Palaeophycus, Planolites, Psammichnites and Rusophycus; shales are highly bioturbated and have a diverse array of traces at shale/sandstone bed interfaces ( Fig. 1; Pickerill 1982Pickerill , 1990Pickerill and Blissett 1999). Studied exposures are hypothesized to represent deposition in shallow subtidal inner-to mid-shelf environments above storm wave base (Tanoli and Pickerill 1989).…”
Section: Geological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study area, arenites also contain linguloid brachiopods and/or are mantled by rare shallow-tier trace fossils such as Palaeophycus, Planolites, Psammichnites and Rusophycus; shales are highly bioturbated and have a diverse array of traces at shale/sandstone bed interfaces ( Fig. 1; Pickerill 1982Pickerill , 1990Pickerill and Blissett 1999). Studied exposures are hypothesized to represent deposition in shallow subtidal inner-to mid-shelf environments above storm wave base (Tanoli and Pickerill 1989).…”
Section: Geological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominance of Rusophycus in an ichnoassemblage, as observed in Suite B, has been interpreted as a hunting strategy, in which trilobites hide in shallow burrows to catch detritus or hunt for soft-bodied prey, as reported in other Paleozoic units (e.g., Whittington, 1980;Seilacher, 1985;Jensen, 1990;Brandt et al, 1995;Pickerill and Blissett, 1999;Rydell et al, 2001;Brandt, 2007). However, the close association of Rusophycus with Protopaleodyction in these beds and their overlapping by Palaeophycus (Figures 4A,B,G) indicate that they were relatively deep burrows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Generally, Rusophycus is interpreted as an arthropod (more specifically trilobites) resting trace produced as a stationary digging for sheltering or resting (Osgood, 1970). In addition, there are some examples of Rusophycus associated with burrows of vermiform organisms, these Rusophycus traces can best be interpreted as predatory hunting burrows (Jensen, 1990; Pickerill & Blissett, 1999; Selly, Huntley, Shelton, & Schiffbauer, 2016). This ichnogenus is a typical ichnotaxon of the Cruziana ichnofacies, commonly found in shallow marine environments (Feng et al, 2021; Pandey, Uchman, Kumar, & Shekhawat, 2014; Singh et al, 2020).…”
Section: Synopsis Of Trace Fossilsmentioning
confidence: 99%