1974
DOI: 10.2307/2334290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Predictive Approach to the Random Effect Model

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Biometrika Trust is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Biometrika. SUMMARY Two simple estimators are derived here for the means of the random … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
690
0
43

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 748 publications
(740 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
7
690
0
43
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our dependent variable reached R² values above 0.1 (Falk and Miller 1992). The cross-validated redundancy indices (Q²) (Geisser 1975;Stone 1974) confirm that the three structural models have satisfactory predictive relevance for the endogenous variable (firm performance).…”
Section: Structural Modelmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, our dependent variable reached R² values above 0.1 (Falk and Miller 1992). The cross-validated redundancy indices (Q²) (Geisser 1975;Stone 1974) confirm that the three structural models have satisfactory predictive relevance for the endogenous variable (firm performance).…”
Section: Structural Modelmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Criterion (Q²) derived using the blindfolding procedure with an omission distance of 7 for predictive relevance (Geisser 1975;Stone 1974;Tenenhaus et al 2005). We conducted this analysis for both the total sample and the two subsamples (Real et al 2014).…”
Section: Structural Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With reference to the evaluation of the inner model, the coefficients of the determination of the endogenous latent variables (R 2 for wine consumption) reveal satisfactory values for the common data set (R 2 ¼ 0.681 and Q 2 ¼ 0.080), the Generation X (R 2 ¼ 0.661 and Q 2 ¼ 0.034) and Generation Y (R 2 ¼ 0.712 and Q 2 ¼ 0.114) sample. Moreover, Stone-Geisser's Q 2 (Stone, 1974;Geisser, 1974) yielded in all cases a value higher than zero for the endogenous latent variable, suggesting the predictive relevance of the explanatory variables.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Structural Relationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…To prove new algorithm is more useful than the typical PLS algorithm, modeling process repeatedly must be considered, which involved such as cross validation [18,19], variable select [20] and missing data in sample data, and so on. Cross-validation techniques can help to select appropriate number of latent factors in case of without knowing the number of latent variables, and then ensure the accuracy of model and efficiency of calculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%