2014
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.04.130306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Predictive Equation to Guide Vitamin D Replacement Dose in Patients

Abstract: Background: Vitamin D is essential for bone health and probably the health of most nonskeletal tissues. Vitamin D deficiency is widespread, and recommended doses are usually inadequate to maintain healthy levels. We conducted a retrospective observational study to determine whether the recommended doses of vitamin D are adequate to correct deficiency and maintain normal levels in a population seeking health care. We also sought to develop a predictive equation for replacement doses of vitamin D.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
4
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…BMI has been linked to 25(OH)D levels, as well as to the response to oral vitamin D supplementation [30],[31]. Previous studies, as well as our results, suggest that subjects with a higher BMI have lower increase in vitamin D levels and may require higher vitamin D dosing [30]–[32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…BMI has been linked to 25(OH)D levels, as well as to the response to oral vitamin D supplementation [30],[31]. Previous studies, as well as our results, suggest that subjects with a higher BMI have lower increase in vitamin D levels and may require higher vitamin D dosing [30]–[32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…26,27 A recently reported 3-month dose-response study of African Americans by Ng and colleagues 28 did not consider or report body weight, but the average body mass index of the participants was 31.2 kg/m 2 . Three treatment groups received doses of 1000, 2000, and 4000 IU/day and achieved 25(OH)D concentrations of 29.7 (up 13.5 from this group's baseline), 34.8 (up 20.9), and 45.9 ng/mL (up 30.2 ng/mL), respectively.…”
Section: Figure 1 Probability Of Vitamin D Deficiency By Body Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the supplemented dose of vitamin D3 to the calculated need, using the formula of Singh et al ,. that considers age, body mass index, and albumin levels in addition to the baseline 25(OH)D level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%