2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2011.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A predictive model for the thermal contact resistance at liquid–solid interfaces: Analytical developments and validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models based on stochastic treatments of asperities have been developed by Mikić [12,13] and take the interface deformation into account. For lubricated contacts on can mention more recent models developed by Hamasaiid et al [14] and Yuan et al [15] giving analytical predictions of thermal contact resistance at liquid-solid interfaces. Most models have been validated experimentally for low contact pressures, Fieberg and Kneer [16] proposed an experimental setup in order to measure thermal contact resistance under higher pressure and temperature conditions.…”
Section: Thermal Contact Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models based on stochastic treatments of asperities have been developed by Mikić [12,13] and take the interface deformation into account. For lubricated contacts on can mention more recent models developed by Hamasaiid et al [14] and Yuan et al [15] giving analytical predictions of thermal contact resistance at liquid-solid interfaces. Most models have been validated experimentally for low contact pressures, Fieberg and Kneer [16] proposed an experimental setup in order to measure thermal contact resistance under higher pressure and temperature conditions.…”
Section: Thermal Contact Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamasaiid et al [142,143] developed a predictive model for the casting-die interface. The advantages of this model are assuming that the heights of asperity follow a Gaussian distribution which is more acceptable for describing the surface topography [113], and using a parameter, mean asperity peak spacing (Rsm), as the spacing of the peaks and valleys.…”
Section: Thermal Resistance Of Thermal Interface Materials (Tim) and Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 26(a) schematically presents the profile of the liquid-solid interface based on the topographic assumption of Hamasaiid's model [143]. Based on the definition of Rc in the CMY model [113], the authors expressed Rc as function of the effective thermal conductivity of the contacting bodies ks, mean asperity peak spacing (Rsm), root-mean-square deviation of the profile(σ) and the height of entrapped air (Y) between the liquid and solid surfaces: (5) In the model, Y is found to influence Rc strongly and determined by the mechanical analysis.…”
Section: Thermal Resistance Of Thermal Interface Materials (Tim) and Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the influence of centimeterscale undulations on h c was simulated with several types of fluids [13,14]. A predictive model was proposed for thermal contact resistance formed at the boundary between liquid and solid phases during die-casting, and was examined in comparison with experimental analysis about convection traps [16]. Topographical effect on convective heat transfer in natural convection was found using numerical simulation by the domain decomposition method [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%