2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A predictive model of complications after spine surgery: the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2005–2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
114
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
114
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Anterior cervical spine surgery-associated complications in a retrospective case-control study an overstatement that anterior cervical approach constitutes one of the most rewarding spinal procedures (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Review Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anterior cervical spine surgery-associated complications in a retrospective case-control study an overstatement that anterior cervical approach constitutes one of the most rewarding spinal procedures (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Review Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of data collection by the NSQIP (including cumulative incidence and reasons for readmission) has been externally validated, 84 and this data source has been previously used to evaluate patients undergoing neurosurgical intervention, 4,8,12,14,15,28,29,45,54,83 including spine surgery. 2,6,9,10,25,40,53,59,61,82,91 Our institutional review board has exempted the de-identified NSQIP data set from individual review.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,7,9,49,59,60,61,71,77,90,91 Despite its utility in evaluating perioperative complications and adverse outcomes, few studies have used the NSQIP to analyze the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for spinal tumors. The goal of this study was to evaluate the 30-day cumulative incidence, time to event, and predictors of major complications, unplanned reoperations, and readmissions after surgery for primary and secondary spinal tumors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) What is the value of the tool for patients with different risk levels? (3) Furthermore, does the tool have a diagnostic value for the prediction of complication?…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since bundled payment programs often include the reimbursement for complication and readmission, it has become increasingly important to identify patients at risk for perioperative complications [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%