2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A predictive score of radial artery spasm in patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, smoking was found to be inversely related with RAS in an FMD study performed by Deftereos et al which is in analogy to our data. 18,19 They explained this phenomenon with a "smoking paradox" and reported that the relationship was not consistent after necessary adjustments. 18 Anxiety was also shown to be in close association with abnormal blood flow patterns based on endothelial dysfunction, which most probably exhibits its role in RAS pathophysiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, smoking was found to be inversely related with RAS in an FMD study performed by Deftereos et al which is in analogy to our data. 18,19 They explained this phenomenon with a "smoking paradox" and reported that the relationship was not consistent after necessary adjustments. 18 Anxiety was also shown to be in close association with abnormal blood flow patterns based on endothelial dysfunction, which most probably exhibits its role in RAS pathophysiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A weighted risk score was created using adjusted multivariate odds ratios, consistent with previous risk score computations. [ 15 ] Patients were stratified by the unweighted risk score into groups. Those groups with fewer than 100 cases were considered together as a single group which applied to unweighted scores of ≥8.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported frequency of spasm in the transradial approach presents huge variations in the literature ranging from 4% to higher than 20% in line with the 12% reported in the present work [ 12 , 13 ]. Numerous factors predisposing to RAS have been identified in the published data including BMI < 25 kg/m 2 , height <170 cm, current smoking, PAD, age, complexity of the procedure, anatomical variations and large radial sheaths and catheter [ 11 ]. To allow a better identification of high risk patients, an RAS risk score has been recently proposed by Giannopoulos et al based on five weighted variables (see methods) with a cut-off of four to predict spasm with a sensitivity of 84.5% and a specificity of 74.7% [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An RAS risk score was calculated for all patients as recently proposed by Giannopulos and coworkers [ 11 ]. It consists of five weighted risk factors for radial artery spasm: body mass index (BMI) less than 25 kg/m 2 (1 point), height less than 170 cm (1 point), current smoking (2 points), hypertension (2 points) and PAD (3 points).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation