2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07512-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A preliminary evaluation of two different meshes in minimally invasive inguinal hernia surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Partially clustered trials with cluster randomisation of pre-existing clusters have been reported in fields including pregnancy and neonatal health, 4349 sports medicine, 50 ophthalmology 51 and surgery. 52…”
Section: Methods and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Partially clustered trials with cluster randomisation of pre-existing clusters have been reported in fields including pregnancy and neonatal health, 4349 sports medicine, 50 ophthalmology 51 and surgery. 52…”
Section: Methods and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partially clustered trials with cluster randomisation of pre-existing clusters have been reported in fields including pregnancy and neonatal health, [43][44][45][46][47][48][49] sports medicine, 50 ophthalmology 51 and surgery. 52 Example trial. A surgical trial compared two mesh prosthetics placed during minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair.…”
Section: Individualmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A few studies that compared laparoscopic and robotic hernia repair were explored in associated publications. Bilezikian et al [151] discussed the results of NCT01825187 [109], in which two different lightweight polypropylene meshes were inserted through the two surgical strategies for treating inguinal hernias in 48 patients. It was observed that robotic mesh placement significantly increased insertion time regardless of mesh type, mainly attributed to the mechanics of robotic suturing and the associated learning curve.…”
Section: Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%