A preliminary report on resilient denture plastics

Lammie, G.A.; Storer, R.

doi:10.1016/0022-3913(58)90067-2

Cited by 69 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This has been reflected from clinical surveys reporting a strong patient preference for them as opposed to hard denture base. 10 Contemporary resilient liner materials whether acrylic/ silicone, are available in autopolymerizing or heat-polymerizing forms. Autopolymerizing liners allow the clinician to reline a removable denture directly, 15,16 intraorally, which is faster […”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of the tensile bond strength of two silicone based denture liners with denture base resins

Mittal

Kumar

Sandhu³

et al. 2016

Medical Journal Armed Forces India

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of the tensile bond strength of two silicone based denture liners with denture base resins

Mittal

Kumar

Sandhu³

et al. 2016

Medical Journal Armed Forces India

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Several lining techniques of soft denture liner have been used in clinics. Lammie (1958) and Storer (1962) introduced two different lining designs for processed soft denture liners; one is the denture with the soft liner covering the attached mucosa and extending past the periphery of the denture and the other is the denture with the soft liner covering the attached mucosa but not extending past the periphery of the denture. Parker (1966) demonstrated that the denture with soft denture liner covering the attached mucosa showed the unilateral deformation of the liner and lift of the opposite side of the denture base when an oblique load was applied.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of lining design of three processed soft denture liners on cushioning effect

Kawano

Ohguri

Koran

et al. 1999

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the lining design of a soft denture liner on its cushioning effect, using a free drop test and an accelerometer. The peak instantaneous acceleration value was computed. The materials tested were SuperSoft(R) (SS), Kurepeet-Dough(R) (KD), and Molloplast-B(R) (MB). Soft denture liners 2 mm in thickness were placed in test denture bases using three different configurations. Specimens were tested at 24 h and at 180 days after storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C. A three-way ANOVA was used to analyse the data (P=0.05) and Tukey intervals were computed. It was found that all three materials were effective in reducing the impact force. The lining design that had the soft denture liner extended to the periphery of the denture base demonstrated the greatest shock absorbability of all the tested designs. A silicone denture liner using lining design 1 was the most effective in reducing the shock transmitted to the denture bases.

show abstract

“…Resilient denture lining materials are used to overcome such injury. Such materials reduce the traumatic effect that a denture may have on patients with thin atrophic mucosa or with normal mucosa but with resorbed ridges, sharp alveolar ridge crest, deep anatomic undercuts, bony protuberances, bruxomania, or where the oral mucosa exhibits a reduced tolerance to the load applied by the denture [17][18][19][20][21] . They also facilitate comfort when used in obturators for acquired and congenital cleft palate [16][17][18][19][20] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative effects of two different artificial body fluids on <I>Candida albicans </I>adhesion to soft lining materials

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigated the C. albicans adhesion to cold-and heat-polymerized soft lining materials that were initially incubated in two different artificial body fluids, namely saliva and nasal secretion, and examined the surface roughness the materials (cold and heat polymerized soft liner) tested in vitro. Cold (Visco Gel) and heat-polymerized (Molloplast B) soft liner specimens (N=32, n=8 per group) (10×10×1.5 mm) were randomly produced to express the relationship between surface roughness and contamination, and influence of body fluids, and incubated in 1.5 ml contaminated solutions for 2 h. After fixation, all of materials were evaluated under optical microscope (×400) and SEM. Surface roughness measurements were examined with profilometre for each material. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD and Dunnett T3 tests (α=0.05). Material type (p<0.05) and contamination media (p<0.05) showed a significant influence on the C. albicans adherence. The surface roughness of cold polymerized soft liner (Visco Gel) was significantly higher than heat-polymerized soft liner (Molloplast B) (p<0.05).

show abstract

A preliminary report on resilient denture plastics

Cited by 69 publications

References 1 publication

Comparative evaluation of the tensile bond strength of two silicone based denture liners with denture base resins

Comparative evaluation of the tensile bond strength of two silicone based denture liners with denture base resins

Influence of lining design of three processed soft denture liners on cushioning effect

Comparative effects of two different artificial body fluids on <I>Candida albicans </I>adhesion to soft lining materials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About