2020
DOI: 10.22158/sll.v4n2p19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Preliminary Review of Eye Tracking Research in Interpreting Studies: Retrospect and Prospects

Abstract: The field of Interpreting Studies (IS) has witnessed an exponential increase in the development of new data-gathering techniques aimed at investigating some of the underlying cognitive and psychological processes.The present article provides a preliminary look into research studies applying eye tracking technology in the field of IS over the past few decades. The present study also aims at exploring the theoretical basis for different applications of eye tracking equipment in the investigation of the cognitive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, these findings, for example, on eye movement patterns in case of difficulties, in the employment of specific strategies, and their differences between trainees and professionals also contribute to interpreting training. Despite the insights afforded by previous reviews of eye-tracking IS, they are somewhat limited in breadth and scope, as the focus is either several selected studies ( Moratto, 2020 ), or a specific research dimension—methodological issues ( Korpal, 2015 ), or a specific theme—cognitive load ( Su et al, 2021 ), or a specific interpreting mode—sight interpreting ( Ma, 2017 ). Thus, this is the first attempt at a comprehensive review of eye-tracking in IS in its entirety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these findings, for example, on eye movement patterns in case of difficulties, in the employment of specific strategies, and their differences between trainees and professionals also contribute to interpreting training. Despite the insights afforded by previous reviews of eye-tracking IS, they are somewhat limited in breadth and scope, as the focus is either several selected studies ( Moratto, 2020 ), or a specific research dimension—methodological issues ( Korpal, 2015 ), or a specific theme—cognitive load ( Su et al, 2021 ), or a specific interpreting mode—sight interpreting ( Ma, 2017 ). Thus, this is the first attempt at a comprehensive review of eye-tracking in IS in its entirety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%