2000
DOI: 10.1002/1098-2361(2000)19:6<485::aid-zoo1>3.0.co;2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A preliminary study of the behavioral effects of feeding enrichment on African elephants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, 37.9% of the observation period was spent foraging, 13.2% of the time spent in locomotion, and 17.6% of the time spent standing. Stoinski, Daniel, and Maple (2000) collected data on a group of African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in a zoological park for 30 minutes twice a day, using scan sampling, and determined feeding occurred for 47-80% of the scans in the morning and 20.5-36.7% in the afternoon, with longer feeding times seen when feeding enrichment was implemented. Locomotion was observed for 3.3-6.5%, while inactivity occurred between 0.6-7.6% of the scans.…”
Section: Activity Time Budgetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, 37.9% of the observation period was spent foraging, 13.2% of the time spent in locomotion, and 17.6% of the time spent standing. Stoinski, Daniel, and Maple (2000) collected data on a group of African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in a zoological park for 30 minutes twice a day, using scan sampling, and determined feeding occurred for 47-80% of the scans in the morning and 20.5-36.7% in the afternoon, with longer feeding times seen when feeding enrichment was implemented. Locomotion was observed for 3.3-6.5%, while inactivity occurred between 0.6-7.6% of the scans.…”
Section: Activity Time Budgetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have seen mixed results when considering whether an increase in enrichment use is associated with a decrease in inactivity. Stoinski et al (2000) did find a negative correlation between enrichment use and inactivity, while Gloyns (2000) did not find such a correlation.…”
Section: Enrichment Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elephants in captivity also receive frequent stimulation from their environment. Some of these stimuli come from human activities, like zoo visitors and exhibit construction, while others are produced through environmental enrichment to simulate the level and sometimes type of stimuli that occur naturally [Stoinski et al, 2000]. Captive elephants are provided with many forms of environmental enrichment, such as toys, music, and different feeding activities [Stoinski et al, 2000;Wells and Irwin, 2008;Wiedenmayer, 1998].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Enrichment strategies vary widely according to species, staff availability and the ingenuity of their keepers. With a few exceptions (and elephant management is one of them; Sevenich, Upchurch & Mellen, 1998; Shepherdson, 1999; Stoinski, Daniel & Maple, 2000) it has rarely been tested in a rigorous fashion as to whether these measures purported to be beneficial actually are. Many enrichment programs, sometimes of necessity, are highly contrived and find no equivalent in a species’ natural environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%