2016
DOI: 10.4172/2329-6577.1000163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Preliminary Study of the Relationship between Obliteration of Cranial Sutures and Age at Time of Death

Abstract: During a forensic investigation, the determination of age at death is typically based on the level of skeletal development. Cranial sutures may help a forensic investigator to determine age at death since there is a predictable interval of age linked to their obliteration. The progression of the obliteration is divided in four stages (from 0 to 3), with the last stage indicating complete obliteration, and specific locations on the sutures are considered most useful for the estimation of age at death. However a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ossification of nearly all cranial sutures is a frequently cited indicator of old age for representatives of various tetrapod groups 7 , However, the cranial sutures can either indeed progressively close, stay open, or even widen during ontogeny in recent archosaurs 32 . The sequence and timing of the fusion also differ between individuals 33 . Therefore, the utility of cranial suture fusion during ontogeny for ontogenetic age estimation is ambiguous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ossification of nearly all cranial sutures is a frequently cited indicator of old age for representatives of various tetrapod groups 7 , However, the cranial sutures can either indeed progressively close, stay open, or even widen during ontogeny in recent archosaurs 32 . The sequence and timing of the fusion also differ between individuals 33 . Therefore, the utility of cranial suture fusion during ontogeny for ontogenetic age estimation is ambiguous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%