2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-s17-s25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A preliminary study on automated freshwater algae recognition and classification system

Abstract: BackgroundFreshwater algae can be used as indicators to monitor freshwater ecosystem condition. Algae react quickly and predictably to a broad range of pollutants. Thus they provide early signals of worsening environment. This study was carried out to develop a computer-based image processing technique to automatically detect, recognize, and identify algae genera from the divisions Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta and Cyanobacteria in Putrajaya Lake. Literature shows that most automated analyses and identification… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, automatic identification and enumeration of microalgae by means of image analysis are powerful tools for monitoring water body conditions and provide early warning signs. Many systems have been developed for these purposes (Blackburn, Hagstr€ om, Wikner, Cuadros-Hansson, & Bjørnsen, 1998;Culverhouse et al, 2006;Embleton, Gibson, & Heaney, 2003;Gorsky, Guilbert, & Valenta, 1989;Kamath et al, 2005;Mosleh, Manssor, Malek, Milow, & Salleh, 2012;Rodenacker, Hense, J€ utting, & Gais, 2006;Santhi, Pradeepa, Subashini, & Kalaiselvi, 2013;Verikas et al, 2012;Yao, Fei, Li, Kong, & Zhao, 2007), and in the following we will shortly describe the system built by our group (Coltelli, Barsanti, Evangelista, Frassanito, & Gualtieri, 2014;Coltelli et al, 2013). Our sys- Acquisition of microscope fields.…”
Section: Experimental Case 4: a Water Monitoring Station For Algal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, automatic identification and enumeration of microalgae by means of image analysis are powerful tools for monitoring water body conditions and provide early warning signs. Many systems have been developed for these purposes (Blackburn, Hagstr€ om, Wikner, Cuadros-Hansson, & Bjørnsen, 1998;Culverhouse et al, 2006;Embleton, Gibson, & Heaney, 2003;Gorsky, Guilbert, & Valenta, 1989;Kamath et al, 2005;Mosleh, Manssor, Malek, Milow, & Salleh, 2012;Rodenacker, Hense, J€ utting, & Gais, 2006;Santhi, Pradeepa, Subashini, & Kalaiselvi, 2013;Verikas et al, 2012;Yao, Fei, Li, Kong, & Zhao, 2007), and in the following we will shortly describe the system built by our group (Coltelli, Barsanti, Evangelista, Frassanito, & Gualtieri, 2014;Coltelli et al, 2013). Our sys- Acquisition of microscope fields.…”
Section: Experimental Case 4: a Water Monitoring Station For Algal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification and classification of algae are usually performed using microscopy, where more recent efforts have been put on automating the system for the rapid, accurate recognition, and classification of algae using image processing techniques such as segmentation, shape feature extraction, pigment structure determination, and neural network grouping [4,5,6,7] and literatures cited therein. The system is slow, expensive, difficult to implement in the field, mostly target specific types of algae, and/or may not work well when images contain too many objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47] demonstrated divide-and-conquer, random and MaxMin sampling options to reduce the dimensions of large-scale genomic data. A Malaysian group reported the results of a freshwater algae classification feasibility study at a lake near Kuala Lumpur that utilized an artificial neural network approach in image processing of algae sizes and shapes [48]. A phylogenetic reconstruction by Biswal et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%