2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw.2015.7301319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A preliminary study on identifying sensors from iris images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They investigated the differentiability of the sensors in the CASIA-Iris V4 database by exploiting their PRNU and concluded that the equal error rates (EERs) and respective thresholds fluctuate considerably, depending on the sensor. Other work by Kalka et al [4] regarding the differentiability of iris sensor showed varying results as well, while studies conducted on fingerprint (FP) sensors by Bartlow et al [2] showed more satisfactory results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They investigated the differentiability of the sensors in the CASIA-Iris V4 database by exploiting their PRNU and concluded that the equal error rates (EERs) and respective thresholds fluctuate considerably, depending on the sensor. Other work by Kalka et al [4] regarding the differentiability of iris sensor showed varying results as well, while studies conducted on fingerprint (FP) sensors by Bartlow et al [2] showed more satisfactory results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the one hand, it was assumed that this high variation could be caused by the correlated data that was used to generate the sensor's PRNU FP, since all images investigated in [3] have a very similar image content. On the other hand, Kalka et al [4] concluded that the variations are caused by the absence of the PRNU in saturated pixels (pixel intensity = 255) or under saturated pixels (pixel intensity = 0) for different images in the data sets. Furthermore, Uhl and Höller [3] suspected that multiple sensors may have been used for the acquisition of the CASIA-Iris V4 subsets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results from Höller et al [9], where the discriminative power of five iris sensors from the CASIA-Iris V4 database has been evaluated show high variations. Other work by Kalka et al [38] regarding the differentiability of iris sensor showed varying results, while studies conducted on fingerprint sensors by Bartlow et al [30] showed more satisfactory results. In order for PRNU fingerprints beeing useful as an authentication measure for biometric systems, the sources of the poor differentiation results have to be determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In order for PRNU fingerprints beeing useful as an authentication measure for biometric systems, the sources of the poor differentiation results have to be determined. Some possible explanations are given in [38] and [9] and consist of the highly correlated data of biometric datasets, saturated pixels and the use of multiple sensors of the same model. An additional caveat for the PRNU extraction is the image content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the principle of PRNU has been used to perform sensor identification in the context of iris biometrics by processing the near-infrared (NIR) ocular images acquired by typical iris sensors [43,27,17,15,16,10,11,36,8]. In this case, sensor identification (or device identification) can be used in conjunction with biometric recognition to authenticate both the identity of a device (e.g., a smartphone) as well as the individual using the device [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%