2014
DOI: 10.1080/00779962.2014.922234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A preliminary survey of altitudinal variation in two ground wētā species,Hemiandrus maculifrons(Walker) andHemiandrus pallitarsis(Walker) (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae)

Abstract: Species' ranges along altitudinal clines are probably influenced by their ability to adapt to a range of abiotic factors. Physical adaptations in response to lower temperatures at higher altitudes often include changes in body size. We investigated the distribution and potential change in body size with altitude of two species of ground wētā, Hemiandrus maculifrons and Hemiandrus pallitarsis in the Moehau Ecological Area on the Coromandel Peninsula, North Island, New Zealand. Over eight nights of searching, 17… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The habitat preference of some of these ground wētā is partially separated by elevation. For example, H. pallitarsis Walker, 1869 is found at lower altitudes than H. maculifrons (Walker, 1869) (Chappell et al 2015). Studies involving other wētā species, for example Hemideina maori (Pictet & Saussure, 1891), H. thoracica (White, 1842) and H. crassidens (Blanchard, 1851), have also shown that wētā occupying particular habitat ranges are physiologically adapted to those microclimates (Ramlov 1999;Bulgarella et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The habitat preference of some of these ground wētā is partially separated by elevation. For example, H. pallitarsis Walker, 1869 is found at lower altitudes than H. maculifrons (Walker, 1869) (Chappell et al 2015). Studies involving other wētā species, for example Hemideina maori (Pictet & Saussure, 1891), H. thoracica (White, 1842) and H. crassidens (Blanchard, 1851), have also shown that wētā occupying particular habitat ranges are physiologically adapted to those microclimates (Ramlov 1999;Bulgarella et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are nocturnal, flightless, relatively abundant across New Zealand, and occupy holes in the ground during the day and emerge at night to forage and mate (Johns 2001). Their body size distributions differ between sexes as females tend to be larger than males (Taylor-Smith et al 2013, Chappell et al 2014, Chappell et al 2015. Ground weta are components of the diet of introduced rodents (Rattus spp.…”
Section: Body Size Of Ground-dwelling Invertebrates and Time (Both Forests)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are nocturnal, flightless, relatively abundant across New Zealand, and occupy holes in the ground during the day and emerge at night to forage and mate (Johns 2001). Their body size distributions differ between sexes as females tend to be larger than males (Taylor-Smith et al 2013, Chappell et al 2014, Chappell et al 2015. Ground weta are components of the diet of introduced rodents (Rattus spp.…”
Section: Body Size Of Ground-dwelling Invertebrates and Time (Both Forests)mentioning
confidence: 99%