2013
DOI: 10.1123/jtpe.32.2.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Preservice Teacher’s Delivery of Sport Education: Influences, Difficulties and Continued Use

Abstract: How preservice teachers (PSTs) learn and deliver Sport Education (SE) (Siedentop, 1994) is an area researchers believe warrants further investigation (Stran & Curtner-Smith, 2009a). This study explores one PST's experiences delivering SE during a school teaching placement after undertaking a practical SE module in his Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE) program. Data were collected through pre, mid-and postteaching placement interviews, along with weekly visits by the first author where observation ref… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that PSTs have experienced student resistance towards roles and responsibility and other features (such as record keeping, statistics and match reports) because students were not familiar with these ways of engaging in learning (Curtner-Smith and Sofo 2004;McMahon and MacPhail 2007;Stran, Sinelnikov, and Woodruff 2012). More generic issues related to teaching such as low student attendance (Stran, Sinelnikov, and Woodruff 2012), range of student skill level (Braga and Liversedge 2017) and students not bringing the correct attire to participate in physical education (Deenihan and MacPhail 2013), have all been noted as further challenges to the effective teaching of SE.…”
Section: The Classroom Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is evidence that PSTs have experienced student resistance towards roles and responsibility and other features (such as record keeping, statistics and match reports) because students were not familiar with these ways of engaging in learning (Curtner-Smith and Sofo 2004;McMahon and MacPhail 2007;Stran, Sinelnikov, and Woodruff 2012). More generic issues related to teaching such as low student attendance (Stran, Sinelnikov, and Woodruff 2012), range of student skill level (Braga and Liversedge 2017) and students not bringing the correct attire to participate in physical education (Deenihan and MacPhail 2013), have all been noted as further challenges to the effective teaching of SE.…”
Section: The Classroom Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While PSTs' PETE experiences can facilitate their teaching of SE (Deenihan and MacPhail 2013; Braga and Liversedge 2017), being assessed on their teaching while undertaking school placement can lead to a concern from PSTs on 'experimenting' with SE (Deenihan and MacPhail 2017). PSTs who were teaching in a custodial school environment were inhibited in their teaching of SE (Deenihan and MacPhail 2017), while supportive structures in the physical education department and in the wider school community worked towards facilitating the teaching of SE (Deenihan and MacPhail 2013). The cooperating teacher also influences PSTs' teaching of SE.…”
Section: The Pete and School Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research studies have begun to address this call by examining the delivery of a single model across a PETE programme before enactment in a school context (Deenihan and MacPhail 2013). While PETE programmes are providing pre-service teachers with opportunities to experience multiple models, they tend to be delivered as discrete models rather than as multimodel MBP (Deenihan et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most preservice teachers are unfamiliar with such curricular frameworks, there is a unique opportunity to identify how factors within occupational socialisation are realised in the beliefs and actual teaching of preservice PE teachers. Most researchers have, through a case study approach, focused on one or two teachers (e.g., preservice or recently qualified teachers) (Deenihan & MacPhail, 2013;McMahon & MacPhail, 2007;O'Leary, 2014;O'Leary, Longmore, & Medcalf, 2014;Romar, Ahlroos, Flykt & Penttinen, 2015;Stran & Curtner-Smith, 2009), while others have studied four to 13 teachers (Li & JAN-ERIK ROMAR, PETER ÅSTRÖM, MAGNUS FERRY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------…”
Section: Theoretical Framworkmentioning
confidence: 99%