2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pressure-correction scheme for convection-dominated incompressible flows with discontinuous velocity and continuous pressure

Abstract: In this work we present a pressure-correction scheme for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations combining a discontinuous Galerkin approximation for the velocity and a standard continuous Galerkin approximation for the pressure. The main interest of pressure-correction algorithms is the reduced computational cost compared to monolithic strategies. In this work we show how a proper discretization of the decoupled momentum equation can render this method suitable to simulate high Reynolds regimes. The propos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that in the present formulation, only acoustic waves are treated semiimplicitly, with gravity waves being treated explicitly [semi-implicit treatment of gravity waves has been adopted, for example, in Smolarkiewicz et al (2014)]. The reader is referred to Botti and Di Pietro (2011) for the implementation and stability of pressure-correction methods combined with DG.…”
Section: The Pressure Projection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that in the present formulation, only acoustic waves are treated semiimplicitly, with gravity waves being treated explicitly [semi-implicit treatment of gravity waves has been adopted, for example, in Smolarkiewicz et al (2014)]. The reader is referred to Botti and Di Pietro (2011) for the implementation and stability of pressure-correction methods combined with DG.…”
Section: The Pressure Projection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This class of methods is known to perform well in both low-Mach and high-Mach number regimes (although this latter may not be relevant for atmospheric applications), while relaxing the severe time step restriction typically fixed by fast-propagating acoustic waves in density-based solvers [for which a continuity equation is solved explicitly, as in Giraldo and Restelli (2008) and Kopera and Giraldo (2014)]. In this context, using a mixed FEM formulation with the velocity possessing more or equal degrees of freedom than the pressure is essential to prevent the formation of spurious numerical pressure modes (Cotter et al 2009a;Botti and Di Pietro 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In addition, it embeds an open-source Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solver (Gnuid, https://github.com/lorbot/Gnuid). 3,4 A schematic of AView general architecture is provided in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Aview Software Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gnuid component is the executable for the Gnuid Mixed Discontinuous-Continuous Galerkin open-source incompressible Navier-Stokes solver. 4 The solver relies on the libMesh library which in turn relies on the PETSc numerical library for solving parallel sparse linear systems, the METIS partitioning library and MPI for message passing. The implemented bundle is completely self-contained, in that it ships with all components illustrated in the Fig.…”
Section: Aview Software Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, the velocity-pressure coupling is stabilized by penalizing the pressure jumps across interfaces with a weight proportional to the meshsize; see, e.g., [19]. As regards the convective term, we use the non-dissipative trilinear form recently proposed by Di Pietro and Ern [22], which has proven suitable to convection-dominated regimes; see also Botti and Di Pietro [9] for the application to a dG discretization of the advection step in the context of a pressure-correction time-integration scheme. Since the convergence analysis is similar as for the dG method of [22], the proofs of the results that hold a fortiori are sometimes omitted to leave room to specific issues related to the ccG method.…”
Section: The Discrete Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%