1959
DOI: 10.1038/1831030a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Presumptive Human XXY/XX Mosaic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
4

Year Published

1960
1960
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
33
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…If this is followed by mitotic non-disjunction, sex chromosome mosaics will arise and Ford (1959a, c) has in fact explained the origin of Klinefelter and Turner mosaics in this way.…”
Section: Case Notementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If this is followed by mitotic non-disjunction, sex chromosome mosaics will arise and Ford (1959a, c) has in fact explained the origin of Klinefelter and Turner mosaics in this way.…”
Section: Case Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, as in that of Ford's (1959a, c), observation has been confined to the bone marrow where ideal conditions exist for the identification of mosaicism. The occurrence of mosaicism in this tissue implies that non-disjunction must have occurred before the functional marrow tissue was produced.…”
Section: Case Notementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He has also contested the theoretical basis of their argument that an increase in the number of males might have been expected on the basis of the physiological inertness of the human Y chromosome, and hence its lack of susceptibility to a dominant lethal type of injury. Recent evidence would argue against such inertness of the Y (Jacobs and Strong, '959; Ford, Polani, Briggs and Bishop, 1959). Some explanation of the variations in the response of different species may be found in the relative activities and sizes of the sex chromosomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first report of Ford et al (1959) regarding 46,XX/47,XXY mosaicism, a number of cases have been recorded in man (cf. Makino 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%