2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2019.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A primal-dual multiplier method for total variation image restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This function is strongly convex satisfying assumption 1 with σ = (2β) −1 , refer to [10]. During the computation, the minimization problem associated with R in (3.3) is solved by primal dual hybrid gradient method [36] with maximum number of iterations 200. We assume that the exact data u(c † ) of the forward problem (4.1) with c = c † is corrupted by Gaussian noise; thus only noisy data u δ is available.…”
Section: Elliptic Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This function is strongly convex satisfying assumption 1 with σ = (2β) −1 , refer to [10]. During the computation, the minimization problem associated with R in (3.3) is solved by primal dual hybrid gradient method [36] with maximum number of iterations 200. We assume that the exact data u(c † ) of the forward problem (4.1) with c = c † is corrupted by Gaussian noise; thus only noisy data u δ is available.…”
Section: Elliptic Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is non-smooth and convex. In these simulations, we will use the primal dual hybrid gradient (PDHG) method introduced in [23] to solve (67). We will next report numerical results to indicate the performance of NHP-DBTS method with various choices of the convex function θ and the Banach space Y.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). This problem can be solved by many classes of operator splitting algorithms, e.g., Douglas-Rachford splitting (DRS) [31], primal-dual splitting (PDS) [51,11], the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) [22,21], Bregman methods [35,49,23,50], and so on 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%