1993
DOI: 10.1016/0968-090x(93)90011-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A primer on usability testing for developers of traveler information systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if users are unwilling to use (low acceptance) or unable to use (low comprehension, huge distraction) these applications, the system technical performance cannot be achieved. Different studies have different approaches for evaluation, such as, based on their pleasantness and usefulness [5], the comfort and benefit [6], or the ease or degree of use [7]. The literature focuses mostly on the contents or formats, reliability, relevance, accuracy, or effectiveness of the information [7].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, if users are unwilling to use (low acceptance) or unable to use (low comprehension, huge distraction) these applications, the system technical performance cannot be achieved. Different studies have different approaches for evaluation, such as, based on their pleasantness and usefulness [5], the comfort and benefit [6], or the ease or degree of use [7]. The literature focuses mostly on the contents or formats, reliability, relevance, accuracy, or effectiveness of the information [7].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies have different approaches for evaluation, such as, based on their pleasantness and usefulness [5], the comfort and benefit [6], or the ease or degree of use [7]. The literature focuses mostly on the contents or formats, reliability, relevance, accuracy, or effectiveness of the information [7]. Van Der Laan proposed a set of nine questions specifically to assess the acceptance level from the perspective of usefulness and satisfaction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%