2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00029-019-0504-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A primitive element theorem for fields with commuting derivations and automorphisms

Abstract: We establish a Primitive Element Theorem for fields equipped with several commuting operators such that each of the operators is either a derivation or an automorphism. More precisely, we show that for every extension F ⊂ E of such fields of zero characteristic such that • E is generated over F by finitely many elements using the field operations and the operators,• every element of E satisfies a nontrivial equation with coefficient in F involving the field operations and the operators,• the action of the oper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that idea of the proof of Theorem 3.13 can be applied in a more general context. Whenever we have a theory of fields with some operators satisfying some primitive element theorem (e.g., as in [8]), then -existential closedness is equivalent to existential closedness. On the other hand, if a theory of fields has a model companion which eliminates quantifiers (in some reasonable language L ), then it is easy to see that the class of -existentially closed models of in the language L is elementary.…”
Section: Wood Axioms Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that idea of the proof of Theorem 3.13 can be applied in a more general context. Whenever we have a theory of fields with some operators satisfying some primitive element theorem (e.g., as in [8]), then -existential closedness is equivalent to existential closedness. On the other hand, if a theory of fields has a model companion which eliminates quantifiers (in some reasonable language L ), then it is easy to see that the class of -existentially closed models of in the language L is elementary.…”
Section: Wood Axioms Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that idea of the proof of Theorem 3.12 can be applied in a more general context. Whenever we have a theory T ′ of fields with some operators satisfying some primitive element theorem (e. g. as in [6]), then 1-existential closedness is equivalent to existential closeness. On the other hand, if a theory of fields T ′ has a model companion which eliminates quantifiers (in some reasonable language L), then it is easy to see that the class of 1-existentially closed models of T ′ in the language L is elementary.…”
Section: Wood Axioms For Fr N − Dcf Pmentioning
confidence: 99%