1994
DOI: 10.1006/knac.1994.1012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A primitives-based generic approach to knowledge acquisition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ref. 19, we have conducted a survey on manual KA methods and interactive KA tools 20 ᎐ 23 and identified four basic interaction techniques as shown in Figure 8. Basically, the grid-dri¨en procedure technique is used in the repertory grid method, which elicits and analyzes the domain expert's world model based on personal construct theory and implemented in ETS 24 and AQUINAS.…”
Section: B Interaction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. 19, we have conducted a survey on manual KA methods and interactive KA tools 20 ᎐ 23 and identified four basic interaction techniques as shown in Figure 8. Basically, the grid-dri¨en procedure technique is used in the repertory grid method, which elicits and analyzes the domain expert's world model based on personal construct theory and implemented in ETS 24 and AQUINAS.…”
Section: B Interaction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many techniques have been proposed, e.g., GAS [3], PROTEGE II [14] and KADS [17] to alleviate it. Most of them are meta-tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite increased activity in the 'non-human' aspects of knowledge acquisition in recent years, (Chien & Ho, 1994;Olson et al, 1995;Sommer et al, 1994), the use of, and research into, human expert-based KE continues (Bolger & Wright, 1994;Corbridge et al, 1994;Sandahl, 1994;Tecuci & Hieb, 1994;Moore et al, 1996;Shaw & Gaines, 1996;Sheremetyeva & Nirenburg, 1996), especially with regard to its validity as a component of a broader approach to knowledge acquisition, being used in conjunction with various other techniques (Donoho & Wilkins, 1994;Reinartz &Schmalhofer, 1994 andOlson et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%