2016 Progress in Electromagnetic Research Symposium (PIERS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/piers.2016.7734863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A printed log-periodic dipole antenna with balanced feed structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculating the antenna factor and comparing it with the standard result of the conventional LPDA antenna is a trusted investigation method to show the validity of the proposed design. For instance, an antenna factor (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41) dB/m for the proposed design is compared to the antenna factor (26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41) dB/m for a commercial (0.7-6) GHz LPDA antenna (HyperLOG ® 7060). Moreover, more investigations could be performed on this antenna for future work, such as the calibration and modeling of an equivalent circuit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Calculating the antenna factor and comparing it with the standard result of the conventional LPDA antenna is a trusted investigation method to show the validity of the proposed design. For instance, an antenna factor (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41) dB/m for the proposed design is compared to the antenna factor (26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41) dB/m for a commercial (0.7-6) GHz LPDA antenna (HyperLOG ® 7060). Moreover, more investigations could be performed on this antenna for future work, such as the calibration and modeling of an equivalent circuit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top microstrip line has a width w f 1 = 3.5 mm while the width of the bottom microstrip line is w f 2 = 5 mm, The 50 Ω impedance point is usually located near the narrow tip of the PLPDA antenna. To achieve impedance bandwidth less than −10 dB for all elements in the array, a parametric sweep has been performed to change the width of the transmission line by creating a balun to balance the surface currents distribution between the two sides of the transmission line as described in [28]. These optimum values are obtained with the help of CST Microwave studio to obtain wider impedance bandwidth starting from 0.5 GHz to 6 GHz.…”
Section: Feeding Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was found that W f = 3.7 mm was the best choice to match the 50 Ω coaxial cable. However, to have the same current on the top and bottom strips of the feed transmission line, the top strip width (W f t ) needs to be decreased to account for the loading effect of the coaxial cable [27,28]. The best balance for W f b = 3.7 mm is W f t = 2.2 mm, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Feed Line Width (W F )mentioning
confidence: 99%