2002
DOI: 10.1006/jdeq.2001.4029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Priori Estimates and Continuation Methods for Positive Solutions of p-Laplace Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
68
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus our result is an improvement because we do not impose either the regularity condition on the function f (as in [6]) or condition (1.2) for all s ≥ 0 (as in [5,7]). Also, we note that we do not assume any convex assumption on Ω.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus our result is an improvement because we do not impose either the regularity condition on the function f (as in [6]) or condition (1.2) for all s ≥ 0 (as in [5,7]). Also, we note that we do not assume any convex assumption on Ω.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We mention recent work on existence of solutions of problem (1.1) where a combination of blowup arguments and nonexistence results for R N is used. Azizieh and Clément [5] studied the case 1 < p ≤ 2. It is assumed that the domain Ω is strictly convex and that there exist positive constants C 1 , C 2 , and q, where…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is particularly useful if the problem under consideration is nonvariational (see, e.g., [2][3][4] and the references therein). Usually these a priori estimates are obtained by using a blow up technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the case of the half-space, it is assumed in [3] that Ω is convex, f does not depend on x, and 1 < m ≤ 2. These assumptions together with the moving plane method allow to obtain a positive solution of −Δ m u ≥ u p in R N , which is a contradiction with the Liouville result in [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%