“…Numerical modelling studies of this type have typically focussed on assessing other aspects of the models, such as the performance of heat, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) sub-models (Wahlqvist and van Hees, 2013;Beji et al, 2013Beji et al, , 2014, the choice of gas-phase combustion model (Wen et al, 2007;Stewart and Kelsey, 2017), or the turbulence closure model used in combination with the hydrodynamic solver (Vasanth et al, 2013). Where studies have considered the capability of models to predict fuel vaporisation rates for pool fires, the work has often been limited to fuel mass loss rates during the quasi-steady burning regime (Hostikka et al, 2002;Rengel et al, 2018). A number of authors have presented comparison of transient burning rate predictions to measured data (Suard et al, 2013;Wahlqvist and van Hees, 2016;Hostikka, 2016, 2017).…”