2018
DOI: 10.5121/ijcnc.2018.10607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Proactive Flow Admission and Re-Routing Scheme for Load Balancing and Mitigation of Congestion Propagation in SDN Data Plane

Abstract: The centralized architecture in software-defined network (SDN) provides a global view of the underlying network, paving the way for enormous research in the area of SDN traffic engineering (SDN TE). This research focuses on the load balancing aspects of SDN TE, given that the existing reactive methods for data-plane load balancing eventually result in packet loss and proactive schemes for data plane load balancing do not address congestion propagation. In the proposed work, the SDN controller periodically moni… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SDN architecture is centralized, focus is on traffic engineering load balancing in data plane. In [10],bayesian network scheme is used to choose alternate path but no multi-controller scenario is used considering the standard network topologies to reduce the SDN controller overhead. Sminesh et al [25], in their work partitioned the network using a modified-Affinity Propogation (AP) clustering algorithm and provides the input by calculating the distance between switch and other components, as well as uses link bandwidth between each .There is no mechanism of load balancing w.r.t server or the response time.No involvement of any external controllers like Mininet is involved, so the network traffic, performance could be analyzed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SDN architecture is centralized, focus is on traffic engineering load balancing in data plane. In [10],bayesian network scheme is used to choose alternate path but no multi-controller scenario is used considering the standard network topologies to reduce the SDN controller overhead. Sminesh et al [25], in their work partitioned the network using a modified-Affinity Propogation (AP) clustering algorithm and provides the input by calculating the distance between switch and other components, as well as uses link bandwidth between each .There is no mechanism of load balancing w.r.t server or the response time.No involvement of any external controllers like Mininet is involved, so the network traffic, performance could be analyzed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SDN, the packet transmission rules are stored and managed in a flow-table inside the switch. Various schemes have been developed for managing flow information for the improvement of the ability of the network [5,6]. Figure 1 demonstrates the flow-table and the flow-entry fields stored inside the flow-table.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the flow-rules are installed into the flow-table in advance in a proactive approach as a network operation begins. The proactive approach can reduce the overhead in the communication between the controllers and switches [4][5][6]. Some more degradation issues related to the SDN performance are (i) topology changes, (ii) network reconfiguration, and iii) re-routing rules creation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%