2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic crack size quantification method using in-situ Lamb wave test and Bayesian updating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The black solid line represented the initial state (6mm-long damage without rotation), which had the highest peak value and the packet was from 0.00016 to 0.00026 s. As for the cyan-blue dotted line presenting the 6mm-long damage with 90-degree orientation, the amplitude was the smallest, but the packet length increased. 21 Figure 22a showed the result of the feature distribution under 100 dB. Wavelet coefficient features clearly classified these data into seven different groups, which distributions were quite different from the damage severity.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Damage Orientation To the Robustness Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The black solid line represented the initial state (6mm-long damage without rotation), which had the highest peak value and the packet was from 0.00016 to 0.00026 s. As for the cyan-blue dotted line presenting the 6mm-long damage with 90-degree orientation, the amplitude was the smallest, but the packet length increased. 21 Figure 22a showed the result of the feature distribution under 100 dB. Wavelet coefficient features clearly classified these data into seven different groups, which distributions were quite different from the damage severity.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Damage Orientation To the Robustness Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of detection (POD) of the damage identification method can be quantified using classical linear models [10,20,45]. Denote the reported stiffness multiplier asθ and the actual stiffness multiplier as θ.…”
Section: Probability Of Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several non-destructive evaluation methods such as ultrasound inspection [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], eddy-current testing [14,15], and Lamb wave-based methods [16][17][18][19][20][21] can effectively identify local damages in a component. To identify the component damage on a global basis, capturing the changes in vibration characteristics of the entire structure is one of the few methods that can be applied in practice [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayes’ theorem has been extensively used in various structural health monitoring applications [54,55,56,57,58]. Bayes’ theorem combines the information of the prior guess with the belief on the current system response through a so-called likelihood function to update the distribution of the parameters of interest [59].…”
Section: Probabilistic Fatigue Crack Sizing Using Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%