2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2017.7989345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic data-driven model for planar pushing

Abstract: Abstract-This paper presents a data-driven approach to model planar pushing interaction to predict both the most likely outcome of a push and its expected variability. The learned models rely on a variation of Gaussian processes with inputdependent noise called Variational Heteroscedastic Gaussian processes (VHGP) [1] that capture the mean and variance of a stochastic function. We show that we can learn accurate models that outperform analytical models after less than 100 samples and saturate in performance wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we presented our earlier dataset on planar pushing [1], it has been directly used for: 1) Stochastic modeling: [23,10,17] 2) Modeling from rendered images: [16] 3) Model identification: [24] 4) Learning models for control: [25,26] 5) Filtering: [27] 6) Meta-learning: [28] With this new dataset we hope to further facilitate research in learning models and control.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we presented our earlier dataset on planar pushing [1], it has been directly used for: 1) Stochastic modeling: [23,10,17] 2) Modeling from rendered images: [16] 3) Model identification: [24] 4) Learning models for control: [25,26] 5) Filtering: [27] 6) Meta-learning: [28] With this new dataset we hope to further facilitate research in learning models and control.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide an insightful table that lists the assumptions and approximations made in much of the work cited in this section. Finally, Bauzá and Rodriguez (2017) used a data-driven approach to model planar pushing interaction to predict both the most likely outcome of a push and, as a novelty, its expected variability. The learned models (also trained on the dataset by Yu et al (2016)) rely on a variation of Gaussian processes whilst avoiding and evaluating the quasi-static assumption.…”
Section: Complementing Analytical Approaches With Data-driven Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature in this area is vast, emerging early from classical solutions that explicitly model the dynamics of pushing with frictional forces [1], [2]. While inspiring, many of these methods rely on modeling assumptions that do not hold in practice [16], [4]. For example, non-uniform friction distributions across object surfaces and the variability of friction are only some of the factors that can lead to erroneous predictions of friction-modeling pushing solutions in real-world settings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%