2017 IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ei2.2017.8245338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic day-ahead scheduling with considering wind power curtailment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, wind power curtailment also has an advantage in that it mitigates wind power uncertainties associated with the short-term variations and the forecasting errors that occur because of the limited operating range of wind generation. In the perspective of day-ahead unit commitment (UC), appropriate wind power curtailments can be one control option [7][8][9] for economic operations, which can reduce the requirements for ramping capability as well as spinning reserve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, wind power curtailment also has an advantage in that it mitigates wind power uncertainties associated with the short-term variations and the forecasting errors that occur because of the limited operating range of wind generation. In the perspective of day-ahead unit commitment (UC), appropriate wind power curtailments can be one control option [7][8][9] for economic operations, which can reduce the requirements for ramping capability as well as spinning reserve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7] the optimization is solved by extended semidefined program relaxations, being an equivalent process to Lagrangean dual. [8] solves a multi-period OPF using the GAMS software (optimization solver programming language using algebraic notation). [9] represents the battery and power grid constraints along the simulation periods using a Fourier coefficient vector, being aggregated to the rest of the nonlinear optimization problem solved using the interior points method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%