2013
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic framework for correlated seismic downtime and repair cost estimation of geo‐structures

Abstract: SUMMARY An important component of probabilistic risk assessment methods is the development of models to quantify the direct consequences of damage to geo‐structural components for a given intensity of the hazard. This paper presents a general probabilistic framework for correlated repair cost and downtime estimation of geo‐structures exposed to seismic hazards. The framework uses as input the results of nonlinear time‐history analysis of geo‐structures for the set of earthquake records that are representative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, soft soil conditions are assumed leading to ω g = 5 rad/s and ζ g = 0.2, according to Kiureghian and Neuenhofer. 40 The combined structure and Kanai-Tajimi model is then linearized using Lyapunov approach in Equation 23. For R-LQR, the control gain is determined using Equation 29c, where the matrix P R − LQR is controlled by the LQR design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, soft soil conditions are assumed leading to ω g = 5 rad/s and ζ g = 0.2, according to Kiureghian and Neuenhofer. 40 The combined structure and Kanai-Tajimi model is then linearized using Lyapunov approach in Equation 23. For R-LQR, the control gain is determined using Equation 29c, where the matrix P R − LQR is controlled by the LQR design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a Poisson distribution, the annual probability of at least 1 earthquake occurrence P (EQ) is expressed as normalP()EQ=1exp()vEQ, where v EQ is the mean annual rate of hazard occurrence. To calculate the expected repair cost for hazard‐induced damage to structural systems, a number of studies, such as Applied Technology Council, Mackie et al, and Shafieezadeh et al, proposed frameworks that are based on detailed element‐level damage assessments. Using these procedures, functions have been derived for the estimation of system loss (or loss of functionality) for a number of sample structures (eg, Mackie et al, Shafieezadeh et al, Karamlou and Bocchini, and Shafieezadeh and Burden).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the bridges, tunnels, wharf structures and various air-transportation structures), and estimating costs. These two aspects, mostly uncertain, are added to other ones as the seismic hazard, the material's nonlinear behaviour, the damage and the structural response [23]. Here the nonlinear static analysis, which is commonly known as "pushover analysis", has been defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%