2002
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic greedy search algorithm for combinatorial optimisation with application to the set covering problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Random and probabilistic greedy approximate algorithms [7,8,9] produce better solutions than the classical greedy algorithm for set covering problem. Randomized greedy algorithm used by Grossman and Wool [2] is same as classical greedy algorithm except that ties are broken at random and the basic algorithm is repeated N times and returns the best solution among the N solutions.…”
Section: Algorithm Gmc(sk)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random and probabilistic greedy approximate algorithms [7,8,9] produce better solutions than the classical greedy algorithm for set covering problem. Randomized greedy algorithm used by Grossman and Wool [2] is same as classical greedy algorithm except that ties are broken at random and the basic algorithm is repeated N times and returns the best solution among the N solutions.…”
Section: Algorithm Gmc(sk)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An adopted strategy to conserve sensor energy is based on an approximate data collection approach [6]. This approach attempts to exploit the spatial correlations among the sensor readings by selecting a subset of representative sensor nodes (referred to as R-nodes) to report their readings to the sink and estimating the readings of the remaining sensors as the readings of the corresponding R-nodes [7] [6] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [9] formulated the problem as a clique-covering problem that partition the sensor nodes into cliques with similar readings. It is reported in [6] that the clique-covering based method, named EEDC, performs better than the snapshot query in term of the number of R-nodes selected. More recently, Hung et al [6] viewed the problem of selecting R-nodes as an energy-aware set covering problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mcgovern et al [34] used a greedy algorithm for a combinatorial optimization analysis of the unary NP-complete disassembly line balancing problem. Other analysis on similar problems with greedy algorithms can be found in the research work of Agnihotri [35], Angelopoulos [36], among others [37,38].…”
Section: Empirical Studies Of Span Of Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%