2010
DOI: 10.3103/s0146411610060027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic model of the control of technical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Q  f also turns out to play a key role in the quantum realm, where it indicates the number of independent operations N that can be performed on a quantum mechanical system subject to thermal decoherence induced by an environment at temperature T. 13 More specifically, the number of coherent oscillations in presence of a thermal environment is given by Q  f  h=ðk B TÞ, which indicates that a Q  f higher than 6Â10 12 is necessary to attain one coherent oscillation at room temperature. Two independent works have demonstrated record values for Q  f in the 10 15 -10 16 range for quartz resonators at ultralow temperature 14,15 and very recent developments on silicon optomechanical crystals 7 allowed reaching a Q  f of 10 14 . Apart from these three works, current state-of-the-art systems are evolving in the 10 10 -10 13 window (see Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Q  f also turns out to play a key role in the quantum realm, where it indicates the number of independent operations N that can be performed on a quantum mechanical system subject to thermal decoherence induced by an environment at temperature T. 13 More specifically, the number of coherent oscillations in presence of a thermal environment is given by Q  f  h=ðk B TÞ, which indicates that a Q  f higher than 6Â10 12 is necessary to attain one coherent oscillation at room temperature. Two independent works have demonstrated record values for Q  f in the 10 15 -10 16 range for quartz resonators at ultralow temperature 14,15 and very recent developments on silicon optomechanical crystals 7 allowed reaching a Q  f of 10 14 . Apart from these three works, current state-of-the-art systems are evolving in the 10 10 -10 13 window (see Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that there is no universal model of the software evaluation and test planning. Moreover, beside the described classes of models, studies suggest simulation models [29], structural models [22], fuzzy models [26,27], interval models [30], software dynamic models [31][32][33], software/hardware complex models [34,35], Bayesian model modifications [19,30,36,37], as well as neural networks applied for certain scientific purposes [38,39]. In order to select a suitable model, a number of qualitative and quantitative criteria can be suggested [40].…”
Section: Evaluation Models and Test Planning Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approval of mandatory requirements for formalizing the results of compliance assessment of high-confidence information protection software [1] lent relevance to the use of mathematical models for assessing IS software performance reliability and safety. Although studies into mathematical models for software reliability assessment were first undertaken back in the second half of the last century [2,3], these issues remain relevant nowadays [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. All this relates both to software manufacturing technologies (for example, open source software) and to newly introduced international standards in the software engineering and information security area (ISO/IEC 15408, ISO/IEC 33001, IEC 61508, IEC 61511 etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%