A probability based hybrid energy-efficient privacy preserving scheme to encounter with wireless traffic snooping in smart home

Abstract

Application of pervasive computing devices in smart homes are rising sharply and due to this matter, demands for efficient privacy protection are increasing urgently. Possibility of interference in wireless networks is proved by previous work. Adversaries can discover contextual information because of traffic monitoring and classifying transmitters based on their radio fingerprints while data packets are encrypted or content is not important for attackers. To conceal communication patterns various approaches have been investigated. They are mainly based on injection of dummy packets into the network traffic and adding delay to transmission time. In this paper, we introduce a hybrid energy-efficient privacy preserving scheme for generating and sending dummy packets through a decision-making algorithm which works based on probability to maximize confusion of attacker in clarifying the real pattern of network traffic.

Smart Home Privacy Protection Methods against a Passive Wireless Snooping Side-Channel Attack

“…Both of these mistakes affect the correctness rate of the attack. Figure 8 illustrates a schematic view of the network traffic in which the attack has formed six activity frames; frames 1 and 5 are correct detections, frame 6 is a false positive, and frames 2 and 3 are undetected events by the attack [ 54 , 55 , 56 ].…”

“…The authors in [ 56 ] briefly introduced a novel concept to counter FATS attacks and suggested a paradigm-shifting strategy for injecting fake packets. The proposed notion is to inject dummy packets collaboratively to impersonate an actual in-home activity; thus, even though these random injections do not interfere with an actual pattern, they can deceive the attack by themselves and prevent energy wastage.…”

Side channel attacks on smart home systems: A short overview

“…Therefore, each action in the home is exposed to attackers. [46] introduced this attack, and [47], [48] have shown potential solutions to this attack.…”