1990
DOI: 10.1090/qam/1052135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A problem in the optimal design of networks under transverse loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 and Remark 1 .4). In the linear case, the previous characterization was proved in [13]. See also [12] for a similar result in the case ah (x, ç) = oç fh (x, ç) with A convex in 3…”
Section: Sufficient Conditions For the G-convergence And Representatimentioning
confidence: 64%
“…5 and Remark 1 .4). In the linear case, the previous characterization was proved in [13]. See also [12] for a similar result in the case ah (x, ç) = oç fh (x, ç) with A convex in 3…”
Section: Sufficient Conditions For the G-convergence And Representatimentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It may result in a mathematical formulation of the problem that allows multiple solutions (see e.g. [4]) or the uncertain misfit representation due to the irreducible measurement errors (see e.g. [5,6,7]).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical formulation of the problem allows multiple solutions. Sometimes, such a possibility might be formally proven (see, e.g., Cabib et al, 1990) and, more frequently, it is either anticipated from the physical evidence or reflects simply our inability to prove the uniqueness.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical formulation of the problem allows multiple solutions. Sometimes, such a possibility might be formally proven (see, e.g., Cabib et al, 1990) and, more frequently, it is either anticipated from the physical evidence or reflects simply our inability to prove the uniqueness.• Uncertainty of the objective function representation. It appears because of both insufficient knowledge of the problem and the errors in data measurements and representation (see, e.g., Koper et al, 1999; Meruane and Heylen, 2009;Caicedo and Yun, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%