1982
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.1982.324882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Procedure for Decomposing the Myoelectric Signal Into Its Constituent Action Potentials-Part II: Execution and Test for Accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been previously demonstrated that the decomposition technique used can accurately identify several motor unit action potential trains in an active contraction (LeFever et al 1982; For the skin stimulation experiments, the recruitment threshold observed during the first contraction are plotted on the abscissa against the threshold observed during the 1COODd, pest-stimulation contraction (plotted on the ordinate). For the control experiments, the abscissa and ordinate points refer to the first and ICCOnd contractions, respectively.…”
Section: Reliability Ofmotor Unit Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been previously demonstrated that the decomposition technique used can accurately identify several motor unit action potential trains in an active contraction (LeFever et al 1982; For the skin stimulation experiments, the recruitment threshold observed during the first contraction are plotted on the abscissa against the threshold observed during the 1COODd, pest-stimulation contraction (plotted on the ordinate). For the control experiments, the abscissa and ordinate points refer to the first and ICCOnd contractions, respectively.…”
Section: Reliability Ofmotor Unit Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luca and co-workers [5], [6] . [8][9][10][11][12][13], the understanding of motor control [14][15][16], and the characterization of MU architecture [17].…”
Section: Prefacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were only suitable for the analysis of EMG signals collected during low-level contractions and could not resolve superimposed MUPs. Semi-automatic methods are much more powerful than the manual methods and utilize many of the same techniques used in automatic methods [5], [6], [45]. Nonetheless, the accuracy of the results obtained by manual methods depend greatly on the skills and experience of the operator.…”
Section: Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations