2001
DOI: 10.1080/104077901460704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Procedure for the Treatment of the Velocity-Pressure Coupling Problem in Incompressible Fluid Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the cost per iteration is higher for the coupled solver, it is more meaningful to compare the CPU time consumed by both solvers. Results in Table 3 indicate that as the grid size increases from 10 4 to 3 Â 10 5 quadrilateral (triangular) control volumes, the corresponding ratio of the CPU time needed by the segregated solver to the CPU time required by the coupled algorithm increases from 13 to 115 (13-104), 18 to 71 (8-58), 4 to 31 (3-33), 8 to 56 (6-54), 8 to 22 (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), and 5 to 38 for the above problems. This represents a tremendous savings as the total time required by the coupled approach to solve all problems on the coarsest and densest quadrilateral (triangular) grids used are 209.6 and 11660.1 (339.7 and 12849.3) seconds while the times required by the segregated method are 1844.89 and 525911.74 (2113.11 and 564206) seconds with the average S/C ratio varying from 8.8 to 45.1 (6.22-43.9).…”
Section: Comparison Of Performance Of the Coupled Solver With The Segmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because the cost per iteration is higher for the coupled solver, it is more meaningful to compare the CPU time consumed by both solvers. Results in Table 3 indicate that as the grid size increases from 10 4 to 3 Â 10 5 quadrilateral (triangular) control volumes, the corresponding ratio of the CPU time needed by the segregated solver to the CPU time required by the coupled algorithm increases from 13 to 115 (13-104), 18 to 71 (8-58), 4 to 31 (3-33), 8 to 56 (6-54), 8 to 22 (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), and 5 to 38 for the above problems. This represents a tremendous savings as the total time required by the coupled approach to solve all problems on the coarsest and densest quadrilateral (triangular) grids used are 209.6 and 11660.1 (339.7 and 12849.3) seconds while the times required by the segregated method are 1844.89 and 525911.74 (2113.11 and 564206) seconds with the average S/C ratio varying from 8.8 to 45.1 (6.22-43.9).…”
Section: Comparison Of Performance Of the Coupled Solver With The Segmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(21) into Eq. (20), and manipulating, the final form of the discretized momentum equations is obtained as…”
Section: The Coupled Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three test problems are, respectively, lid-driven cavity¯ow [18,19], rectangular tank¯ow [2], and backward-facing step¯ow [20,21], as shown schematically in Figures 2a±2c. The three test problems are, respectively, lid-driven cavity¯ow [18,19], rectangular tank¯ow [2], and backward-facing step¯ow [20,21], as shown schematically in Figures 2a±2c.…”
Section: Applications and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use PCM is a way to store thermal energy in reducing the material volume and in building applications to choose the phase-change temperature to reach a thermal comfort temperature [1][2][3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%