1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(99)00031-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A process-design approach to error compensation in the end milling of pockets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tool path machining programs are introduced by using these software while many forms, such as one-way, zigzag, spiral, etc., are proposed for the machining path. Selection of these methods affects also machining time and surface quality of the machined material [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tool path machining programs are introduced by using these software while many forms, such as one-way, zigzag, spiral, etc., are proposed for the machining path. Selection of these methods affects also machining time and surface quality of the machined material [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is required to choose a suitable cutting tool among these materials in order to provide the maximum efficiency during machining [1,[4][5][6][7][8]. Determination of the material of the tool and the cutting geometry is very essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The forces are modelised as concentrated forces localised at the contact point between the tool and the part and finally a cantilever beam model is used for the calculation of the deflection. Some authors propose other combinations: Seo [2] and Law [13] use concentrated forces applied at the middle of E A , Kops [7] makes a comparison between cantilever beam modelisation and MEF, Ryu [12] takes into account the deformation of tool clamping parts thanks to concentrated longitudinal and rotational stiffness . Some drawbacks such as the lack of accuracy, the calculation time, the limitation to straight line make these methodologies not applicable in practice for interactive tool path generation.…”
Section: Determination Of the Tool Deflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, many researchers focus on the end milling of pockets [11][12][13][14]. The numerical model of the cutting forces is normally used to predict the force variations, which makes it difficult to realize the process optimization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%