2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A process for modeling short- and long-term risk in the southern Oregon Cascades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wildfire was the dominant cause of habitat loss, although habitat increased under all scenarios, suggesting that it may be possible to both increase restoration and increase habitat for northern spotted owl in this landscape. Roloff et al (2005) modeled active management and no management in fire-prone landscapes in southwestern Oregon and found that active management in owl foraging areas reduced owl habitat compared with no management (only losses to wildfire). However, in a second analysis, Roloff et al (2012) found that active management "was more favorable to spotted owl conservation...than no management."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wildfire was the dominant cause of habitat loss, although habitat increased under all scenarios, suggesting that it may be possible to both increase restoration and increase habitat for northern spotted owl in this landscape. Roloff et al (2005) modeled active management and no management in fire-prone landscapes in southwestern Oregon and found that active management in owl foraging areas reduced owl habitat compared with no management (only losses to wildfire). However, in a second analysis, Roloff et al (2012) found that active management "was more favorable to spotted owl conservation...than no management."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, previous published assessments of fire on spotted owls have not explicitly considered fire and forest regrowth rates (Wilson and Baker 1998, Lee and Irwin 2005, Roloff et al 2005, 2012, Ager et al 2007, Lehmkuhl et al 2007. Not including the probability of high-severity fire, which is low, leads to highly inflated projections of the effects of thinning versus not thinning on high-severity fire (Rhodes andBaker 2008, Campbell et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous assessments of the efficacy of thinning treatments in reducing fire disturbances in spotted owl habitat (Wilson and Baker 1998, Lee and Irwin 2005, Roloff et al 2005, 2012, Ager et al 2007, Lehmkuhl et al 2007 have not incorporated the probability of high-severity fires occurring during the treatment lifespan. The effect of this is to overestimate treatment efficacy in potentially controlling fire or fire behavior (Rhodes and Baker 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finney (2005) presented a simplified version of our approach using FARSITE to simulate fire risk on a 900 km 2 area near Missoula, Montana; 20,000 simulations were used in his example with a simplified weather scenario. Roloff et al (2005) also used FAR-SITE and other tools to estimate short-and long-term risk associated with fuel treatments in the southern Cascades of Oregon. Sixteen ignition points were used in the Roloff et al study.…”
Section: Simulation Of Fire Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%