A Process for Transition to Sustainability: Implementation

Abstract

This paper reports the outcomes of the second action cycle of an ongoing project at Edith Cowan University (ECU) called Transition to Sustainability: ECU South West which is located in a small, single faculty regional university campus. The overall project has comprised three action research cycles, the first of which was the planning cycle which established the importance of building a community of practice with a learning stance for sustainability transition. It also highlighted the issue of a common definition of the term sustainability; of including cross-disciplinary perspectives; and of working with the local community. The second action cycle which was the first implementation phase, is the subject of this report.In this phase, we found that by not foreclosing on the meaning of sustainability, important aspects of sustainability were included. Although research participants initially expressed some concern about using an open understanding of sustainability, the problem of the meaning functioned to foster involvement in dialogue. In fact, these ongoing discussions around sustainability and the notion of a sustainable future formed the heart of this action cycle. However there were constraints associated with the subject of dialogue. These included problems of site communication, the maintenance of effective networks and issues around power and authorisation. We observed that each of these elements could work together in ways that enrich and/or obstruct a transition to sustainability. Finally, we found that lack of time hinders participation in sustainability transition projects because of its effect on authentic dialogue, thereby impacting upon the development of collaborative ways of working within the university.Our project is distinctively Australian in that it reflects an emerging movement in Australia to create social frameworks for embedding sustainability education activities. In our project, the transition process by which learning and change has been facilitated comprises the action research itself.

Rethinking science for sustainable development: Reflexive interaction for a paradigm transformation

“…Among the remarkable exceptions are those based on institutional decisions recently made by strong leaders who succeeded in making available the means and midterm orientation for founding new institutes. In Germany, Leuphana University Lüneburg and the Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment, and Energy are very good examples (U Schneidewind & Jahn, 2012)-numerous others could be added from other countries as well, such as Edith Cowan University in Australia (Wooltorton, Palmer, & Steele, 2011), and Schumacher College in England (Sterling, 2011). With the creation of dedicated centres, institutes, and study programmes, the transformation towards science for sustainable development has definitely started.…”

How Academics in Undergraduate Business Programs at an Australian University View Sustainability

“…An important aspect of progressing EafS in the business curriculum would be for school curriculum decision makers to facilitate widespread and purposeful discussion within and between faculty staff, as discussed by Wooltorton, Palmer, and Steele (2011). The different levels of present engagement with sustainability need to be acknowledged and debated within academic communities to more fully inform the process of curriculum development.…”

“…The latter were analysed in terms of each program and four pillars of sustainability. (Wooltorton et al, 2011) Three distinct patterns of implementation: (1) student-led change from informal to formal learning;…”

Evaluating Conscious Consumption: A Discussion of a Survey Development Process

“…The rationale for the question stems from the literature, which indicates correction of informational asymmetries may influence behavioral change and that individuals are more likely to modify their behavior when they are aware of global impacts. Wooltorton et al (2011) [71] examine the outcomes of the implementation of a sustainability initiative on an Australian university campus and find that an important first step is for individuals to be aware of and understand both their own environmental impact and options for changing their behavior. Steg and Vlek (2009) [72] explain that while informational campaigns are unlikely to cause behavior changes, prompts or reminders are more effective in changing behavior.…”