2021
DOI: 10.1111/flan.12548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A process tracing study of the dynamic patterns of boredom in an online L3 course of German during COVID‐19 pandemic

Abstract: The Challenge COVID-19 pandemic is followed by an unprecedented popularity of online education. But, does online language learning create any particular source of boredom? What levels of boredom does an L3 learner experience in an online course and what are the underlying reasons? The present case study aims to unravel these causal mechanisms using process-tracing which is an innovative qualitative research method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on the emotional experiences of learners learning languages in the emergency remote learning context has found a variety of emotions associated with online learning, of which boredom seems to be the most examined in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Studies analyse sources of boredom and language learners' coping strategies ( Pawlak, Derakhshan, Mehdizadeh, & Kruk, in press ) or track the causal mechanisms of boredom and its impact on language learners over time ( Yazdanmehr, Shirvan, & Saghafi, 2021 ). Pawlak et al, ’s (in press) survey of Iranian university students and teachers reveals that both groups consider online classes more boring than offline classes, and that students found content-based courses more boredom-inducing than skills-based courses.…”
Section: Research On Online Language Teaching and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research on the emotional experiences of learners learning languages in the emergency remote learning context has found a variety of emotions associated with online learning, of which boredom seems to be the most examined in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Studies analyse sources of boredom and language learners' coping strategies ( Pawlak, Derakhshan, Mehdizadeh, & Kruk, in press ) or track the causal mechanisms of boredom and its impact on language learners over time ( Yazdanmehr, Shirvan, & Saghafi, 2021 ). Pawlak et al, ’s (in press) survey of Iranian university students and teachers reveals that both groups consider online classes more boring than offline classes, and that students found content-based courses more boredom-inducing than skills-based courses.…”
Section: Research On Online Language Teaching and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students report having limited strategies to cope with boredom in online learning, with some simply resorting to debilitative strategies such as skipping classes. Yazdanmehr et al’s (2021) study uses a process-tracing approach to analyse a semester-long account of one L3 learner's experiences. The analysis reveals changing levels of boredom across the semester, with the peak occurring in the initial stage.…”
Section: Research On Online Language Teaching and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past few years have witnessed more CDST-compatible research designs in exploring L2 learners’ affective variables. Examples are the foreign language enjoyment literature (e.g., Elahi Shirvan and Taherian, 2018 , 2020a , b ; Elahi Shirvan and Talebzadeh, 2018a , b ; Elahi Shirvan et al, 2020 ) and foreign language learning boredom literature (e.g., Elahi Shirvan et al, 2021 ; Kruk et al, 2021 ; Yazdanmehr et al, 2021 ). Among the innovative qualitative methods have been process tracing and ecological assessment.…”
Section: Social Network Analysis and A Complex Dynamic Systems Theory...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, inspired by the CDST, some emerging research methods have been recently used in the L2 affective domain which are consistent with the CDST framework. Some of these emerging methods in the L2 affective domain are retrodictive qualitative modeling, the idiodynamic method, self-organizing maps, Q-methodology ( Kruk et al, 2022 ), process-tracing ( Yazdanmehr et al, 2021 ), ecological momentary assessment, and experience sampling method. What derived the application of these methods in the L2 affective domain is rooted in the problem-driven approach of CDST to inquiry which appreciates the expansion of the methodological repertoires in a given academic domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%