2005
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.26768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Profile of Farmers' Market Consumers and the Perceived Advantages of Produce Sold at Farmers' Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, two national studies found that people of various education and income levels purchase locally produced food (Keeling-Bond et al, 2009;Zepeda & Li, 2006). Wolf et al (2005) studied 336 farmers market patrons in San Luis Obispo County, California reported mixed results. The researchers found that the age, income levels, and occupational status of farmers market customers and shoppers who do not patronize farmers markets were similar.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Farmers Market Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, two national studies found that people of various education and income levels purchase locally produced food (Keeling-Bond et al, 2009;Zepeda & Li, 2006). Wolf et al (2005) studied 336 farmers market patrons in San Luis Obispo County, California reported mixed results. The researchers found that the age, income levels, and occupational status of farmers market customers and shoppers who do not patronize farmers markets were similar.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Farmers Market Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Price is a barrier that prohibits some from shopping at farmers markets (Bond et al, 2006;Grace et al, 2007;Jilcott Pitts et al, 2010;Onianwa et al, 2006;Wetherill & Gray, 2015;Wolf et al, 2005). A study of 143 SNAP customers at farmers markets found that only 35.9% strongly agreed that they could afford to purchase the fruits and vegetables at the market.…”
Section: Interrogating Farmers Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these studies have indicated that fruit purchase is associated with gender, age, income and rurality [43]. Being female, having a high income and living in a rural area have been found to be key characteristics of fruit consumers [43][44][45]. Other studies suggest that higher education [45][46][47] and age [44][45][46] are important characteristics.…”
Section: Socio-demographicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being female, having a high income and living in a rural area have been found to be key characteristics of fruit consumers [43][44][45]. Other studies suggest that higher education [45][46][47] and age [44][45][46] are important characteristics. A third line of study suggests that socio-demographic backgrounds do not have as much impact on fruit consumption and purchase.…”
Section: Socio-demographicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While universal human values have been widely studied as predictors for consumer buying decisions related to food [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ], the degree to which growing over buying affects these decisions is yet to be explored. Socio-demographic factors were not included in the study, as prior studies indicate that there is no consensus on their significance [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. Recent research investigating the factors that determined the preferences of US consumers towards growing over buying fruit before and after the COVID-19 pandemic showed that socio-demographic factors were largely insignificant [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%