A Profile of Gender-Based Violence Research in Europe: Findings From a Focused Mapping Review and Synthesis

Abstract

This article reports the findings from a new form of review: a focused mapping review and synthesis. The aim was to create a contemporary, snapshot profile of the nature and scope of gender-based violence (GBV) studies conducted in Europe. GBV is one of the most prevalent human rights violations in the world affecting mainly women and girls. The policy context of GBV in Europe has gathered momentum in recent years, but we do not have a clear picture of how this relates to research activity. Thirteen journals were purposively selected on their likelihood to publish GBV research. All articles published in these journals during 2015 and meeting our inclusion criteria were retrieved. Data were extracted according to (1) types of methodologies used, (2) geographical location of research, and (3) patterns of research activity/interest. Thirty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Many titles and abstracts were not explicit about the gendered nature of the research which made retrieval and analysis difficult. A range of methodologies were reported, with single-country research conducted more than international collaborations. Intimate partner violence and sexual abuse attracted most research interest. No studies explored female genital mutilation/cutting and only one investigated early and forced marriage. The findings have implications regarding GBV research in Europe, and we explore them in relation to relevant European policy. Researchers can help raise the profile of the gendered nature of most violence-related research by being explicit about this in their publications. Increasing opportunities for cross-national research will help address the global nature of GBV. Tackling GBV requires synergy of empirical evidence and policy to drive the agenda.

Which Violence Against Women Educational Strategies Are Effective for Prequalifying Health-Care Students?: A Systematic Review

“…As discussed earlier, some forms of GBV are more culturally driven than others and may therefore be discussed to a greater extent in non-English language journals. That said, a recent European-focused mapping review and synthesis by Bradbury-Jones, Appleton, Clark, and Paavilainen (2019) found that IPV and sexual abuse are the GBV forms that receive the majority of literature attention, consistent with the findings here. While these two forms likely represent the largest global GBV burden, it was disappointing that no other forms featured in this review.…”

A focused mapping review and synthesis of a priori risk factors associated with medical misconduct

“…We undertook an FMRS of fitness to practice investigations involving complaints about medical misconduct. FMRS is an emerging form of review that has been used and described only recently 19–23. Unlike many other review methodologies that produce a broad and exhaustive systematic review of the literature, this review methodology reduces the breadth of a study, ensuring the research has a specific focus.…”

Building Capacity for Prevention of Gender-Based Violence in the School Context

“…On the whole, despite minor differences, these findings indicate that the same training programme would be suitable for all three countries. The international training programme would be in accordance with a guideline that international collaboration across Europe is important to improve the longerterm well-being of parties of GBV (Bradbury-Jones et al, 2017).…”