1996
DOI: 10.2307/4450103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Profile of High School Biology Textbooks Using Scientific Literacy Recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (National Center for Education Statistics, 1996) revealed a continuing emphasis on textbooks and lectures to convey science content. Reviews of these traditional textbooks commonly used in secondary science classrooms find few accompanying inquiry‐based activities (Chiapetta, Sethna &, Fillman, 1993; Lumpe & Beck, 1996; Lunetta & Tamir, 1981). Although strategies exist for redesigning traditional laboratory activities to have a more inquiry focus (i.e., Volkmann & Abell, 2003), there are only isolated examples in the literature of individual teachers successfully redesigning curriculum materials to be more inquiry based (Crawford, 2000; Roehrig & Luft, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (National Center for Education Statistics, 1996) revealed a continuing emphasis on textbooks and lectures to convey science content. Reviews of these traditional textbooks commonly used in secondary science classrooms find few accompanying inquiry‐based activities (Chiapetta, Sethna &, Fillman, 1993; Lumpe & Beck, 1996; Lunetta & Tamir, 1981). Although strategies exist for redesigning traditional laboratory activities to have a more inquiry focus (i.e., Volkmann & Abell, 2003), there are only isolated examples in the literature of individual teachers successfully redesigning curriculum materials to be more inquiry based (Crawford, 2000; Roehrig & Luft, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Una elección cuidadosa de los contenidos nucleares a nivel de programas de estudio oficiales incidirá de manera indirecta en los libros de texto, pero no se debe confiar en que esto sucederá de forma automática, pues ninguna reforma educacional puede pasar por alto el rol del libro de texto debido al fuerte impacto que ejercen sobre la enseñanza (Lumpe y Beck, 1996).…”
Section: Enseñanza De Las Ciencias Núm 353 (2017): 107-127unclassified
“…Biology teachers, especially novices, value the textbook as a key planning and instructional tool (Tulip & Cook, ; Weiss et al, ; Yore, ). Yet, barring a few exceptions, scientists and educators have criticized traditional biology textbooks for their lack of coherence (American Association for the Advancement of Science, ; Roseman, Stern, & Koppal, ), their unjustified claims (Hurd, ; Merzyn, ), and their expository, authorless writing style that fails to reflect the scientific enterprise (Chiappetta & Fillman, ; Goldman & Bisanz, ; Lumpe & Beck, ; Phillips & Norris, ). While e‐books may transform the type of texts that students engage, current alternatives to TTs exist, albeit with far less influence.…”
Section: The Role Of Texts In Biology Classroomsmentioning
confidence: 99%