2020
DOI: 10.12659/msm.928400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prognostic Molecular Signature of N⁶-Methyladenosine Methylation Regulators for Soft-Tissue Sarcoma from The Cancer Genome Atlas Database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 31 These findings indicate that the 14-gene signature may play a critical role in the development and progression of sarcomas and may serve as a prognostic tool. In contrast to previous studies, 32 , 33 , 34 the novel IRG signature proved to be suitable for different sarcoma subtypes. The present results suggest that although sarcoma subtypes are partially heterogeneous, these entities share a common genetic background.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“… 31 These findings indicate that the 14-gene signature may play a critical role in the development and progression of sarcomas and may serve as a prognostic tool. In contrast to previous studies, 32 , 33 , 34 the novel IRG signature proved to be suitable for different sarcoma subtypes. The present results suggest that although sarcoma subtypes are partially heterogeneous, these entities share a common genetic background.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Tumor angiogenesis can also support chemoresistance and EMT formation as well as apoptosis inhibition. Indeed, some of the lesser reported m 6 A "readers" may also support tumor progression, high expression of YTHDC2 may increase mutation frequency in favor of tumorigenesis and portend a poor prognosis for patients with soft tissue sarcoma [ 265 ].…”
Section: A Methylation Regulates the Biological Functions Of Tumor Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to diverse histopathological classification, STS has not been fully understood so far, which received widespread attention ( Trojani et al, 1984 ). A previous study constructed an m6A-related risk model to predict the prognosis of STS ( Hou et al, 2020 ). However, different m6A modification patterns were not analyzed comprehensively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%