2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/7245142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prognostic Tool for Individualized Prediction of Graft Failure Risk within Ten Years after Kidney Transplantation

Abstract: Identification of patients at risk of kidney graft loss relies on early individual prediction of graft failure. Data from 616 kidney transplant recipients with a follow-up of at least one year were retrospectively studied. A joint latent class model investigating the impact of serum creatinine (Scr) time-trajectories and onset of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (dnDSA) on graft survival was developed. The capacity of the model to calculate individual predicted probabilities of graft failure over time … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The real parameters were chosen to mimic the real data, described in Stamenic et al paper [ 15 ], dealing with a prognostic tool for individualized prediction of graft failure risk within ten years after kidney transplantation, using serum creatinine progression as a longitudinal marker. Following Eqs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The real parameters were chosen to mimic the real data, described in Stamenic et al paper [ 15 ], dealing with a prognostic tool for individualized prediction of graft failure risk within ten years after kidney transplantation, using serum creatinine progression as a longitudinal marker. Following Eqs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time points for repeated measures of the longitudinal marker are fixed to 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, following Stamenic et al [ 15 ]. The parameters vector for a 2-classes model, with class common random effect and error variance of mixed sub-model is as follows: …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations