2021
DOI: 10.3982/ecta17764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Projection Framework for Testing Shape Restrictions That Form Convex Cones

Abstract: This paper develops a uniformly valid and asymptotically nonconservative test based on projection for a class of shape restrictions. The key insight we exploit is that these restrictions form convex cones, a simple and yet elegant structure that has been barely harnessed in the literature. Based on a monotonicity property afforded by such a geometric structure, we construct a bootstrap procedure that, unlike many studies in nonstandard settings, dispenses with estimation of local parameter spaces, and the crit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, our data-driven UCBs for h 0 and its partial derivatives apply to nonparametric regression with non-Gaussian, heteroskedastic errors as a special case. 6 Finally, our work also compliments several recent papers on (non data-driven) estimation and inference for sieve NPIV models with shape constraints; see for example Chetverikov and Wilhelm (2017), Chernozhukov, Newey, and Santos (2015), Blundell et al (2017), Freyberger and Reeves (2019), Zhu (2020), and Fang and Seo (2021). Each of these works assumes a deterministic sequence of sieve tuning parameters satisfying regularity conditions that depend on unknown model features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In fact, our data-driven UCBs for h 0 and its partial derivatives apply to nonparametric regression with non-Gaussian, heteroskedastic errors as a special case. 6 Finally, our work also compliments several recent papers on (non data-driven) estimation and inference for sieve NPIV models with shape constraints; see for example Chetverikov and Wilhelm (2017), Chernozhukov, Newey, and Santos (2015), Blundell et al (2017), Freyberger and Reeves (2019), Zhu (2020), and Fang and Seo (2021). Each of these works assumes a deterministic sequence of sieve tuning parameters satisfying regularity conditions that depend on unknown model features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Following the original version of this paper, Zhu (2019) and Fang and Seo (2019) proposed inference methods for convex restrictions which, while applicable to an important class of problems, rule out inference on nonlinear functionals or tests of certain shape restrictions. Also related is Freyberger and Reeves (2018) who developed uniform inference for functionals under shape restrictions while imposing point identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, we show in Section 4.4.2 that an important insight in Andrews, Roth, and Pakes (2019) allows us to adapt our methodology to conduct sub‐vector inference in a class of conditional moment inequality models. Our analysis is also conceptually related to work on sub‐vector inference in models involving moment inequalities and to a literature on shape restrictions; see, for example, Romano and Shaikh (2008), Bugni, Canay, and Shi (2017), Kaido, Molinari, and Stoye (2019), Gandhi, Lu, and Shi (2019), Chernozhukov, Newey, and Santos (2015), Zhu (2019), and Fang and Seo (2021). While these procedures are designed for general problems that do not possess the specific structure in (1), they are, as a result, less computationally tractable and/or rely on more demanding and high‐level conditions than the ones we employ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%