2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13042-018-0886-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A projection method for multiple attribute group decision making with probabilistic linguistic term sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main advantage of our method was the consideration of the dominance flow and the unknown weights, which indicates that our method is valid for managing actual decision-making issues. However, in our method, the dominance flow is simply derived using the difference value between score results, which will lead to information loss; thus, in the future, we shall continue to study the MAGDM issues with our developed method and find a more suitable way to describe the dominance flow in other decision-making domains [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of our method was the consideration of the dominance flow and the unknown weights, which indicates that our method is valid for managing actual decision-making issues. However, in our method, the dominance flow is simply derived using the difference value between score results, which will lead to information loss; thus, in the future, we shall continue to study the MAGDM issues with our developed method and find a more suitable way to describe the dominance flow in other decision-making domains [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 3. Utilize Equations (16) and (17) to compute the deviation degrees between each alternative and the PIS L(p) * and NIS L(p) # , respectively: (17) Step 4. Derive the closeness index CI(x i ) of each alternative x i ∈ X(i = 1, 2, • • • , 4):…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars also extended some classic decision-making methods to PLTS situations, and explored their usefulness in decision making areas [1,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Several scholars have successfully explored the application of the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) in the PLTS environment [1,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Pang et al (2016) presented a distance-based extended TOPSIS method with PLTSs. Zhang X.F. et al (2019) argued that this extended TOPSIS only considered the distance proximity of alternatives with respect to ideal and negative ideal solutions, while ignored the proximity in direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al (2019) argued that this extended TOPSIS only considered the distance proximity of alternatives with respect to ideal and negative ideal solutions, while ignored the proximity in direction. In response to this problem, Zhang X.F. et al (2019) developed a projection method to solve MAGDM with PLTSs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%